Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study

Volume: 93, Pages: 45 - 55
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in main characteristics, reporting and methodological quality between prospectively registered and nonregistered systematic reviews.PubMed was searched to identify systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials published in 2015 in English. After title and abstract screening, potentially relevant reviews were divided into three groups: registered non-Cochrane reviews, Cochrane reviews,...
Paper Details
Title
Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study
Published Date
Jan 1, 2018
Volume
93
Pages
45 - 55
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.