The Incidence of Taxes and Spending in Sri Lanka

Published on May 1, 2017
Nisha Kanthimathie Arunatilake1
Estimated H-index: 1
Gabriela Inchauste8
Estimated H-index: 8
Nora Lustig31
Estimated H-index: 31
Sri Lanka has made substantial progress in reducing poverty over the past decade. However, important social and economic development needs persist at a time when revenue collections have been disappointing, reducing the government’s ability to expand spending. In this context, this paper has sought to evaluate the effectiveness of fiscal policy in addressing inequality and accelerating poverty reduction. The exercise consisted of undertaking incidence analysis of the major tax and transfer programs individually, and then combining them to evaluate the incidence of fiscal policy as a whole. Although we could not carry out incidence analysis of all budget items, we have analyzed the major tax and spending items for which individual tax and benefits can be assigned to households using microdata. The analysis finds that taxes and social spending were redistributive and poverty-reducing overall. However, given the country’s relatively low revenue and the limited fiscal space, overall social spending was small, leading to very limited impacts. On the spending side, direct transfers are absolutely progressive, so that their marginal contribution is both equalizing and poverty-reducing. In contrast, spending on indirect subsidies increased with a large part of the resources benefiting nonpoor households. Finally, the analysis found that in kind transfers in the form of education and health are equalizing. Going forward, any efforts to reform taxes could usefully include distributional analysis to assess their impact.
  • References (0)
  • Citations (1)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1 Author (Nora Lustig)
5 Citations
1 Author (Nora Lustig)
19 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
Cited By1
This chapter examines the impact of tax reforms on inequality. It begins with an examination of the meaning of inequality and its dimensions. While the usual division of 1% and 99% has its own merit, this chapter argues that the situation is more complex, especially among the 99%. The real income of those in the middle of the distribution has also stagnated in recent decades. On the other hand, primarily due to inadequate investment, growth rate in most economies has been sluggish. This chapter ...