Knee osteoarthritis has doubled in prevalence since the mid-20th century

Published on Aug 29, 2017in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America9.58
· DOI :10.1073/pnas.1703856114
Ian J. Wallace13
Estimated H-index: 13
(Harvard University),
Steven Worthington6
Estimated H-index: 6
(Harvard University)
+ 5 AuthorsDaniel E. Lieberman58
Estimated H-index: 58
(Harvard University)
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is believed to be highly prevalent today because of recent increases in life expectancy and body mass index (BMI), but this assumption has not been tested using long-term historical or evolutionary data. We analyzed long-term trends in knee OA prevalence in the United States using cadaver-derived skeletons of people aged ≥50 y whose BMI at death was documented and who lived during the early industrial era (1800s to early 1900s; n = 1,581) and the modern postindustrial era (late 1900s to early 2000s; n = 819). Knee OA among individuals estimated to be ≥50 y old was also assessed in archeologically derived skeletons of prehistoric hunter-gatherers and early farmers (6000–300 B.P.; n = 176). OA was diagnosed based on the presence of eburnation (polish from bone-on-bone contact). Overall, knee OA prevalence was found to be 16% among the postindustrial sample but only 6% and 8% among the early industrial and prehistoric samples, respectively. After controlling for age, BMI, and other variables, knee OA prevalence was 2.1-fold higher (95% confidence interval, 1.5–3.1) in the postindustrial sample than in the early industrial sample. Our results indicate that increases in longevity and BMI are insufficient to explain the approximate doubling of knee OA prevalence that has occurred in the United States since the mid-20th century. Knee OA is thus more preventable than is commonly assumed, but prevention will require research on additional independent risk factors that either arose or have become amplified in the postindustrial era.
Figures & Tables
  • References (55)
  • Citations (59)
#1Richard F. LoeserH-Index: 59
#2John A. Collins (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 5
Last.Brian O. Diekman (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 13
view all 3 authors...
#1Marita Cross (RNSH: Royal North Shore Hospital)H-Index: 32
#2Emily R. Smith (RNSH: Royal North Shore Hospital)H-Index: 32
Last.Catherine J. Hill (University of Adelaide)H-Index: 47
view all 10 authors...
#1Christopher Margono (UW: University of Washington)H-Index: 150
#2Jerry P. Abraham (University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio)H-Index: 19
Last.Gretchen L. Birbeck (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 38
view all 10 authors...
Cited By59
#1Weihua Meng (Dund.: University of Dundee)H-Index: 5
#2Mark J. Adams (Edin.: University of Edinburgh)H-Index: 20
Last.Andrew M. McIntosh (Edin.: University of Edinburgh)H-Index: 68
view all 10 authors...
#1Miguel Castilho (TU/e: Eindhoven University of Technology)H-Index: 10
#2Vivian Mouser (TU/e: Eindhoven University of Technology)
Last.ItoKeita (TU/e: Eindhoven University of Technology)H-Index: 44
view all 5 authors...
View next paperRadiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis