Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit

L. Bengt van Rijssen; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Maurice J. W. Zwart; Bert A. Bonsing; Koop Bosscha; Ronald M. van Dam; Casper H.J. van Eijck; Michael F. Gerhards; Erwin van der Harst; Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh; Marc G. Besselink; Dutch Pancreatic Canc Grp

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.010

doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.010

Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit

,

,

..., Dutch Pancreatic Canc Grp

1

HPB2.90

Volume: 19, Issue: 10, Pages: 919 - 926

Published: Oct 1, 2017

Abstract

Auditing is an important tool to identify practice variation and 'best practices'. The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit is mandatory in all 18 Dutch centers for pancreatic surgery.Performance indicators and case-mix factors were identified by a PubMed search for randomized controlled trials (RCT's) and large series in pancreatic surgery. In addition, data dictionaries of two national audits, three institutional databases, and the Dutch national...

Paper Fields

Paper Details

Title

Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit

DOI

doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.010

Published Date

Oct 1, 2017

Journal

HPB

Volume

19

Issue

10

Pages

919 - 926

Citation AnalysisPro

You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro

Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?

Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.

Learn more

Notes

History