Positive economics

Empirical research

Empirical evidence

Machine learning

Gender studies

Value (mathematics)

Feminism

Commodity

Computer science

Mythology

Market economy

Philosophy

Sociology

Feminist theory

Psychology

Human sexuality

Social psychology

Epistemology

Economics

Theology

Psychology of Women Quarterly

The authors of sexual economics theory (Baumeister &amp; Twenge, 2002; Baumeister &amp; Vohs, 2004) argue that sex is a female commodity that women exchange for men’s resources; therefore, women (not men) are responsible for the cultural suppression of sexuality, ostensibly to preserve the value of sex. In this article, I describe the central tenets of sexual economics theory and summarize a growing body of research contradicting them. I also explain the negative implications of the claims of sexual economics theory for gender equality and heterosexual relationships. Researchers, clinicians, and educators engaged in understanding human sexuality may use the arguments provided in this article to counteract gender myths. This article also serves as a case study of how feminist scholars can employ empirical evidence to weaken a popularized, patriarchal theory.

Myths of Sexual Economics Theory