Value of second-opinion review of outside institution PET-CT examinations

Volume: 38, Issue: 4, Pages: 306 - 311
Published: Apr 1, 2017
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to determine whether second-opinion reviews of PET/CT examinations by subspecialists alter reporting of malignant findings. Materials and methods This IRB-approved study compared 240 fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT consecutively dictated reports by two nuclear medicine subspecialists against the original outside institution reports. Subspecialist reviews documented whether malignant findings on the outside report...
Paper Details
Title
Value of second-opinion review of outside institution PET-CT examinations
Published Date
Apr 1, 2017
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
306 - 311
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.