Blinding applicants in a first-stage peer-review process of biomedical research grants: An observational study
Abstract
To blind or not researcher’s identity has often been a topic of debate in the context of peer-review process for scientific publication and research grant application. This article reports on how knowing the name and experience of researchers/institutions influences the qualification of a proposal. We present our experience of managing the peer-review process of different biomedical research grants. The peer-review process included three...
Paper Details
Title
Blinding applicants in a first-stage peer-review process of biomedical research grants: An observational study
Published Date
May 30, 2017
Journal
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
181 - 189
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History