Treatment of multiple test readers in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews-meta-analyses of imaging studies
Abstract
To evaluate the handling of multiple readers in imaging diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews-meta-analyses.Search was performed for imaging diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews that performed meta-analysis from 2005-2015. Handling of multiple readers was classified as: 1) averaged; 2) 'best' reader; 3) 'most experienced' reader; 4) each reader counted individually; 5) random; 6) other; 7) not specified. Incidence and reporting of multiple...
Paper Details
Title
Treatment of multiple test readers in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews-meta-analyses of imaging studies
Published Date
Aug 1, 2017
Volume
93
Pages
59 - 64
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History