Match!

The time dimension of science: Connecting the past to the future

Published on May 1, 2017in Journal of Informetrics3.879
· DOI :10.1016/j.joi.2017.04.002
Yian Yin2
Estimated H-index: 2
(NU: Northwestern University),
Dashun Wang16
Estimated H-index: 16
(NU: Northwestern University)
Sources
Abstract
A central question in science of science concerns how time affects citations. Despite the long-standing interests and its broad impact, we lack systematic answers to this simple yet fundamental question. By reviewing and classifying prior studies for the past 50 years, we find a significant lack of consensus in the literature, primarily due to the coexistence of retrospective and prospective approaches to measuring citation age distributions. These two approaches have been pursued in parallel, lacking any known connections between the two. Here we developed a new theoretical framework that not only allows us to connect the two approaches through precise mathematical relationships, it also helps us reconcile the interplay between temporal decay of citations and the growth of science, helping us uncover new functional forms characterizing citation age distributions. We find retrospective distribution follows a lognormal distribution with exponential cutoff, while prospective distribution is governed by the interplay between a lognormal distribution and the growth in the number of references. Most interestingly, the two approaches can be connected once rescaled by the growth of publications and citations. We further validate our framework using both large-scale citation datasets and analytical models capturing citation dynamics. Together this paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the time dimension of science, representing a new empirical and theoretical basis for all future studies in this area.
Figures & Tables
  • References (82)
  • Citations (10)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
201341.04Science
339 Citations
5,164 Citations
3 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References82
Newest
#1Satyam Mukherjee (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 10
#2Daniel M. Romero (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 17
Last. Brian Uzzi (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 34
view all 4 authors...
Scientists and inventors can draw on an ever-expanding literature for the building blocks of tomorrow’s ideas, yet little is known about how combinations of past work are related to future discoveries. Our analysis parameterizes the age distribution of a work’s references and revealed three links between the age of prior knowledge and hit papers and patents. First, works that cite literature with a low mean age and high age variance are in a citation “hotspot”; these works double their likelihoo...
22 CitationsSource
#1Lovro Šubelj (University of Ljubljana)H-Index: 13
#2Dalibor Fiala (University of West Bohemia)H-Index: 9
In this article, we show that the dramatic increase in the number of research articles indexed in the Web of Science database impacts the commonly observed distributions of citations within these articles. First, we document that the growing number of physics articles in recent years is attributed to existing journals publishing more and more articles rather than more new journals coming into being as it happens in computer science. Second, even though the references from the more recent article...
9 CitationsSource
#1Miguel Guevara (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 6
#2Dominik Hartmann (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 5
Last. César A. Hidalgo (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 22
view all 5 authors...
In recent years scholars have built maps of science by connecting the academic fields that cite each other, are cited together, or that cite a similar literature. But since scholars cannot always publish in the fields they cite, or that cite them, these science maps are only rough proxies for the potential of a scholar, organization, or country, to enter a new academic field. Here we use a large dataset of scholarly publications disambiguated at the individual level to create a map of science--o...
24 CitationsSource
#1Roberta Sinatra (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 16
#2Dashun Wang (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 16
Last. Albert-La szlo Baraba siH-Index: 120
view all 5 authors...
Are there quantifiable patterns behind a successful scientific career? Sinatra et al. analyzed the publications of 2887 physicists, as well as data on scientists publishing in a variety of fields. When productivity (which is usually greatest early in the scientist's professional life) is accounted for, the paper with the greatest impact occurs randomly in a scientist's career. However, the process of generating a high-impact paper is not an entirely random one. The authors developed a quantitati...
136 CitationsSource
#1Marcelo MendozaH-Index: 13
#2César A. HidalgoH-Index: 22
Last. Manuel AristaránH-Index: 3
view all 5 authors...
1 Citations
#1Katalin Orosz (ELTE: Eötvös Loránd University)H-Index: 2
#2Illés J. Farkas (MTA: Hungarian Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 23
Last. Péter Pollner (MTA: Hungarian Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 9
view all 3 authors...
Our current societies increasingly rely on electronic repositories of collective knowledge. An archetype of these databases is the Web of Science (WoS) that stores scientific publications. In contrast to several other forms of knowledge--e.g., Wikipedia articles--a scientific paper does not change after its "birth". Nonetheless, from the moment a paper is published it exists within the evolving web of other papers, thus, its actual meaning to the reader changes. To track how scientific ideas (re...
7 CitationsSource
#1Lindell BromhamH-Index: 37
#2Russell DinnageH-Index: 8
Last. Xia HuaH-Index: 11
view all 3 authors...
The degree of interdisciplinarity in research proposals negatively correlates with funding success across a wide range of research fields.
115 CitationsSource
#1Athen Ma (QMUL: Queen Mary University of London)H-Index: 11
#2Raul J. Mondragon (QMUL: Queen Mary University of London)H-Index: 11
Last. Vito Latora (University of Catania)H-Index: 58
view all 3 authors...
Seeking research funding is an essential part of academic life. Funded projects are primarily collaborative in nature through internal and external partnerships, but what role does funding play in the formulation of these partnerships? Here, by examining over 43,000 scientific projects funded over the past three decades by one of the major government research agencies in the world, we characterize how the funding landscape has changed and its impacts on the underlying collaboration networks acro...
26 CitationsSource
#1Michael Szell (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 16
#2Roberta Sinatra (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 16
Science is an enterprise driven fundamentally by social relations and dynamics (1). Thanks to comprehensive bibliometric datasets on scientific production and the development of new tools in network science in the past decade, traces of these relations can now be analyzed in the form of citation and coauthorship networks, shedding light on the complex structure of scientific collaboration patterns (2, 3), on reputation effects (4), and even on the development of entire fields (5, 6). What about ...
9 CitationsSource
#1João Moreira (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 5
#2Xiao Han T. Zeng (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 6
Last. Luís A. Nunes AmaralH-Index: 59
view all 3 authors...
How to quantify the impact of a researcher’s or an institution’s body of work is a matter of increasing importance to scientists, funding agencies, and hiring committees. The use of bibliometric indicators, such as the h-index or the Journal Impact Factor, have become widespread despite their known limitations. We argue that most existing bibliometric indicators are inconsistent, biased, and, worst of all, susceptible to manipulation. Here, we pursue a principled approach to the development of a...
17 CitationsSource
Cited By10
Newest
#1Shutian Ma (Nanjing University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 2
#2Chengzhi Zhang (Nanjing University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 6
Last. Xiaozhong Liu (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 11
view all 3 authors...
Citation recommendation systems play an important role to alleviate the dilemma that scholar users spend a lot of time and experiences for literature survey. With the burgeoning computational models and open data movement, scientific repository can provide more evidence in support of recommendation. On the one hand, recommenders are applying better algorithms to understand the text of user queries and candidate citations. On the other hand, more types of data such as citation network and co-auth...
Source
#1Matteo Chinazzi (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 6
#2Bruno GonçalvesH-Index: 2
Last. Alessandro Vespignani (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 88
view all 4 authors...
Scientific discoveries do not occur in vacuum but rather by connecting existing pieces of knowledge in new and creative ways. Mapping the relation and structure of scientific knowledge is therefore central to our understanding of the dynamics of scientific production. Here we introduce a new approach to generate scientific knowledge maps based on a machine learning approach that, starting from the observed publication patterns of authors, generates an N -dimensional space where it is possible to...
2 CitationsSource
#1Yong Huang (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 3
#2Yi Bu (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 7
Last. Wei Lu (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 7
view all 4 authors...
Source
#1Alexander Michael Petersen (UCM: University of California, Merced)H-Index: 21
#2Raj Kumar Pan (Aalto University)H-Index: 23
Last. Santo Fortunato (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 44
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Quantitative research evaluation requires measures that are transparent, relatively simple, and free of disciplinary and temporal bias. We document and provide a solution to a hitherto unaddressed temporal bias – citation inflation – which arises from the basic fact that scientific publication is steadily growing at roughly 4% per year. Moreover, because the total production of citations grows by a factor of 2 every 12 years, this means that the real value of a citation depends on when ...
3 CitationsSource
#1Michael Golosovsky (HUJI: Hebrew University of Jerusalem)H-Index: 23
We consider scientific publications as a growing complex network where papers are nodes and citations are links which connect these papers together. We explain this network approach and make special accent on the temporal aspect of citation network, namely, we focus on the growth of the number of papers, age distribution of references, and citation dynamics. We trace relation of the age distribution of references to citation dynamics and explore this reference-citation duality.
Source
Modeling and predicting citation dynamics of individual articles is important due to its critical role in a wide range of decisions in science. While the current modeling framework successfully captures citation dynamics of typical articles, there exists a nonnegligible, and perhaps most interesting, fraction of atypical articles whose citation trajectories do not follow the normal rise‐and‐fall pattern. Here we systematically study and classify citation patterns of atypical articles, finding th...
Source
#1Binglu WangH-Index: 1
#2Yi BuH-Index: 7
Last. Win-Bin HuangH-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Zhuo-Ming Ren (University of Fribourg)H-Index: 3
#2An Zeng (BNU: Beijing Normal University)H-Index: 20
Last. Yi-Cheng Zhang (University of Fribourg)H-Index: 45
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Complex systems are extremely hard to predict due to its highly nonlinear interactions and rich emergent properties. Thanks to the rapid development of network science, our understanding of the structure of real complex systems and the dynamics on them has been remarkably deepened, which meanwhile largely stimulates the growth of effective prediction approaches on these systems. In this article, we aim to review different network-related prediction problems, summarize and classify relev...
8 CitationsSource
#1Raj Kumar Pan (Aalto University)H-Index: 23
#2Alexander Michael Petersen (UCM: University of California, Merced)H-Index: 21
Last. Santo Fortunato (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 44
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Scientific production is steadily growing, exhibiting 4% annual growth in publications and 1.8% annual growth in the number of references per publication, together producing a 12-year doubling period in the total supply of references, i.e. links in the science citation network. This growth has far-reaching implications for how academic knowledge is connected, accessed and evaluated. Against this background, we analyzed a citation network comprised of 837 million references produced by 3...
10 CitationsSource
#1Binglu Wang (PKU: Peking University)H-Index: 1
#2Yi Bu (IU: Indiana University)H-Index: 7
Last. Yang Xu (PKU: Peking University)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Citation is regarded as one of the “norms of science” (Merton in Am Sociol Rev 22(6):635–659, 1957) and is deeply researched by the field of scientometrics. The motivations authors have for citing one another are considered significant and have been the subject of extensive qualitative research such as content analysis, questionnaires, and interviews of citing authors. However, the existing qualitative studies have covered a limited number of samples. To expand the dataset, this paper proposes a...
1 CitationsSource