Review paper
Philosophers On Psychopaths: A Cautionary Tale in Interdisciplinarity
Abstract
Philosophers typically rely on empirical data when they comment on psychopaths’ moral responsibility. Many argue that psychopaths, as per the data, suffer from significant impairments in the precursors of moral reasoning and behavior, and therefore they should not be held morally responsible for their actions. However, careful analysis of these studies shows that this view is mistaken. We discuss how several philosophers— perhaps following the...
Paper Details
Title
Philosophers On Psychopaths: A Cautionary Tale in Interdisciplinarity
Published Date
Jan 1, 2017
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1 - 12
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History