Evaluation, ranking and selection of R&D projects by multiple experts: an evidential reasoning rule based approach
Abstract
As a typical multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problem, research and development (R&D) project selection involves multiple decision criteria which are formulated by different frames of discernment, and multiple experts who are associated with different weights and reliabilities. The evidential reasoning (ER) rule is a rational and rigorous approach to deal with such MCGDM problems and can generate comprehensive distributed evaluation...
Paper Details
Title
Evaluation, ranking and selection of R&D projects by multiple experts: an evidential reasoning rule based approach
Published Date
Mar 1, 2017
Journal
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
1501 - 1519
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History