Match!

Aquifer Drawdown and Recovery in the Northeast Groundwater Management Area, Wisconsin, USA: A Century of Groundwater Use

Published on Mar 7, 2017
· DOI :10.3390/geosciences7010011
John A. Luczaj6
Estimated H-index: 6
,
Julie Maas1
Estimated H-index: 1
+ 1 AuthorsJonathan Odekirk1
Estimated H-index: 1
Abstract
The Northeast Groundwater Management Area of Wisconsin, USA contains two major cones of depression in a confined sandstone aquifer. Each cone is centered near cities that have used groundwater for over 100 years. Near one of these cities (Green Bay), episodic changes in the development of groundwater and surface water resources during this period have resulted in major changes to the potentiometric surface. On two occasions, roughly 50 years apart, reductions in groundwater withdrawals have resulted from the construction of pipelines drawing surface water from Lake Michigan. In each case, rapid recovery of the potentiometric surface by as much as 70 m has occurred in the northern of the two pumping cones. The most recent switch occurred during 2006 and 2007 when eight communities stopped pumping groundwater, reducing daily withdrawals by approximately 46.37 million liters. The rate of water level recovery has diminished in some areas, with a return to a flowing artesian state for some municipal and residential wells. Although the northern portion of the groundwater management area has returned to a sustainable condition in the confined aquifer, the portion with the southern cone of depression remains in a state of prolonged drawdown.
  • References (9)
  • Citations (3)
References9
Newest
#1John A. LuczajH-Index: 6
Last.Megan J. Olson HuntH-Index: 5
view all 3 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Kevin ErbH-Index: 1
#2Eric RonkH-Index: 1
Last.John A. LuczajH-Index: 6
view all 4 authors...
4 CitationsSource
#1John A. Luczaj (UWSP: University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point)H-Index: 6
#2Kevin Masarik (UWGB: University of Wisconsin–Green Bay)H-Index: 1
17 CitationsSource
#1Tim Grundl (UWM: University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee)H-Index: 9
#2Nathan Magnusson (UWM: University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee)H-Index: 1
Last.Rolf Kipfer (Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology)H-Index: 42
view all 4 authors...
15 CitationsSource
226 CitationsSource
#1Takeshi Hayashi (Akita University)H-Index: 7
#2Tomochika Tokunaga (UTokyo: University of Tokyo)H-Index: 15
Last.Makoto TaniguchiH-Index: 41
view all 5 authors...
53 CitationsSource
24 CitationsSource
#1Madeline B. Gotkowitz (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 8
#2Madeline E. Schreiber (VT: Virginia Tech)H-Index: 18
Last.J. A. Simo (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
26 CitationsSource
#1Rebecca S. Burkel (UWGB: University of Wisconsin–Green Bay)H-Index: 1
#2Richard C. Stoll (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources)H-Index: 1
40 CitationsSource
Cited By3
Newest
#1Ryle Nørskov GejlH-Index: 2
#2Martin RygaardH-Index: 10
Last.Poul Løgstrup BjergH-Index: 45
view all 5 authors...
6 CitationsSource
16 CitationsSource
#1Anthony J. Tesoriero (USGS: United States Geological Survey)H-Index: 17
#2Jo Ann M. Gronberg (USGS: United States Geological Survey)H-Index: 8
Last.Brian P. Austin (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources)H-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
1 CitationsSource
View next paperDelineating groundwater/surface water interaction in a karst watershed: Lower Flint River Basin, southwestern Georgia, USA