Ambition at work and career satisfaction: The mediating role of taking charge behavior and the moderating role of pay

Published on Feb 13, 2017in Career Development International1.56
· DOI :10.1108/CDI-07-2016-0124
Sabrine El Baroudi2
Estimated H-index: 2
Chen Fleisher2
Estimated H-index: 2
+ 2 AuthorsJulia Richardson18
Estimated H-index: 18
View in Source
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the moderating role of pay in the relationship between employee ambition and taking charge behavior, and its subsequent effects on employee career satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach A two-wave quantitative investigation was conducted among alumni of a large public university in the Netherlands. Findings The results show that taking charge behavior mediates the positive relationship between employee ambition and career satisfaction. They also show that pay positively moderates this mediation, such that the relationship between employee ambition and taking charge behavior is stronger when ambitious employees receive an increase in pay, leading to increased career satisfaction. Conversely, a decrease in pay does not moderate ambitious employees’ taking charge behavior and the impact on their career satisfaction. Research limitations/implications The study draws on self-report data collected in one country: the Netherlands. Practical implications The study highlights the importance of pay for higher job involvement, demonstrating its impact on taking charge behavior among employees with higher levels of ambition. Originality/value This is the first empirical study to examine the impact of pay on employees’ taking charge behavior and the subsequent implications for career satisfaction.
  • References (70)
  • Citations (4)
#1Michael B. ArthurH-Index: 39
#2Svetlana N. KhapovaH-Index: 14
Last.Julia RichardsonH-Index: 18
view all 3 authors...
9 Citations
#1Judith PlompH-Index: 2
#2Maria TimsH-Index: 15
Last.Arnold B. BakkerH-Index: 105
view all 6 authors...
19 CitationsSource
10 CitationsSource
#1Daniel Han Ming Chng (China Europe International Business School)H-Index: 5
#2Joyce C. Wang (UTD: University of Texas at Dallas)H-Index: 3
5 CitationsSource
#1Chiara Consiglio (Sapienza University of Rome)H-Index: 9
#2Laura Borgogni (Sapienza University of Rome)H-Index: 15
Last.Wilmar B. Schaufeli (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 106
view all 4 authors...
18 CitationsSource
#1Cécile Tschopp (ETH Zurich)H-Index: 4
#2Dana Unger (ETH Zurich)H-Index: 7
Last.Gudela Grote (ETH Zurich)H-Index: 30
view all 3 authors...
7 CitationsSource
#1Maria Tims (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 15
#2Arnold B. Bakker (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 105
Last.Daantje Derks (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 26
view all 3 authors...
72 CitationsSource
#1Brian J. Taber (Oakland University)H-Index: 5
#2Maureen Blankemeyer (KSU: Kent State University)H-Index: 9
46 CitationsSource
#1Tae-Yeol Kim (China Europe International Business School)H-Index: 20
#2Zhiqiang Liu (HUST: Huazhong University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 7
Last.James M. Diefendorff (University of Akron)H-Index: 33
view all 3 authors...
33 CitationsSource
43 CitationsSource
Cited By4
#1Sabrine El Baroudi (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 2
#2Svetlana N. Khapova (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 14
Last.Julia Richardson (Curtin University)H-Index: 2
view all 4 authors...
#1Sabrine El Baroudi (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 2
#2Svetlana N. Khapova (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 14
Last.Paul Jansen (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 32
view all 4 authors...
2 CitationsSource
#1Leah D. Sheppard (WSU: Washington State University)H-Index: 7
3 CitationsSource
#1Samson Onyeluka Chukwuedo (University of Benin)H-Index: 2
#2Chinyere Theresa Ogbuanya (UNN: University of Nigeria, Nsukka)