Review paper
Long Working Hours and Well-being: What We Know, What We Do Not Know, and What We Need to Know
Abstract
Despite a widespread belief in both the academic and public policy literatures that working long hours is deleterious to health and well-being, our critical review of this large and complex literature fails to support a robust direct causal effect of work hours on either physical or mental well-being outcomes. Large-scale epidemiological studies, many of which are prospective and include objective health outcome measures, support a statistically...
Paper Details
Title
Long Working Hours and Well-being: What We Know, What We Do Not Know, and What We Need to Know
Published Date
Nov 19, 2016
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
25 - 39
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History