“Local determination”, even if we could find it, does not challenge free will: Commentary on Marcelo Fischborn

Published: Nov 15, 2016
Abstract
Marcelo Fischborn discusses the significance of neuroscience for debates about free will. Although he concedes that, to date, Libet-style experiments have failed to threaten “libertarian free will” (free will that requires indeterminism), he argues that, in principle, neuroscience and psychology could do so by supporting local determinism. We argue that, in principle, Libet-style experiments cannot succeed in disproving or even establishing...
Paper Details
Title
“Local determination”, even if we could find it, does not challenge free will: Commentary on Marcelo Fischborn
Published Date
Nov 15, 2016
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.