Identifying Anomalous Citations for Objective Evaluation of Scholarly Article Impact
Abstract
Evaluating the impact of a scholarly article is of great significance and has attracted great attentions. Although citation-based evaluation approaches have been widely used, these approaches face limitations e.g. in identifying anomalous citations patterns. This negligence would inevitably cause unfairness and inaccuracy to the article impact evaluation. In this study, in order to discover the anomalous citations and ensure the fairness and...
Paper Details
Title
Identifying Anomalous Citations for Objective Evaluation of Scholarly Article Impact
Published Date
Sep 8, 2016
Journal
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
e0162364 - e0162364
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History