What happened to Popperian falsification? Publishing neutral and negative findings

Volume: 23, Issue: 3, Pages: 481 - 508
Published: Aug 1, 2016
Abstract
Purpose Current publication practices in the scholarly (International) Business and Management community are overwhelmingly anti-Popperian, which fundamentally frustrates the production of scientific progress. This is the result of at least five related biases: the verification, novelty, normal science, evidence, and market biases. As a result, no one is really interested in replicating anything. In this essay, the author extensively argues what...
Paper Details
Title
What happened to Popperian falsification? Publishing neutral and negative findings
Published Date
Aug 1, 2016
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
481 - 508
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.