Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola

Volume: 30, Issue: 4, Pages: 702 - 727
Published: Jul 6, 2016
Abstract
The study departs from two assumptions. First, it considers that organizations, their leaders and the HRM function are inherently paradoxical and that, in that sense, dealing with paradox is a necessary component of the leadership process which requires ambidexterity capabilities. Second, it explores whether the paradoxes of leadership may manifest differently in different contexts. We explore the emergence of paradox in the leadership of...
Paper Details
Title
Ambidextrous leadership, paradox and contingency: evidence from Angola
Published Date
Jul 6, 2016
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
702 - 727
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.