Match!

Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation

Published on Dec 23, 2013
Christian Welzel28
Estimated H-index: 28
Abstract
Introduction Part I. Understanding Emancipative Values: 1. A theory of emancipation 2. Mapping differences 3. Multi-level drivers 4. Tracing change Part II. Emancipative Values as a Civic Force: 5. Intrinsic wellbeing 6. Benign individualism 7. Collective action Part III. Democratizing Impulses of Emancipative Values: 8. Entitling people 9. The rights revolution 10. The paradox of democracy Part IV. Emancipative Values in Human Civilization: 11. The redirection of civilization 12. The sustainability challenge Conclusion.
  • References (0)
  • Citations (172)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1,820 Citations
2,927 Citations
1997
1 Author (Ronald Inglehart)
3,638 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References0
Newest
Cited By172
Newest
#1Camelia Florela Voinea (UB: University of Bucharest)H-Index: 3
Source
Research on protests and social movements in China has mushroomed alongside the rising occurrences of mass incidents. What drives up citizens’ protest potential, however, has led to two competing theories: the “rights consciousness” view and the “rules consciousness” view. By fitting structural equation model on a nationally representative survey dataset, this paper specifies and estimates these two competing explanations of an individual’s protest potential. This paper finds that rights conscio...
Source
#1Mohammed AkacemH-Index: 2
Last. John Leonard FaulknerH-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Paulina GórskaH-Index: 1
#1Paulina Górska (University of Warsaw)H-Index: 4
Theories of social change developed within social psychology are rarely employed to interpret historical events. This is a serious neglect, as a social-psychological perspective has the capacity to inform our understanding of long-term processes that prepare the ground for major political breakthroughs. In this commentary, I utilize the political solidarity model of social change (Subasic, Reynolds, & Turner, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308323223) to examine Poland’s path to democracy. ...
1 CitationsSource
#1Christian Welzel (HSE: National Research University – Higher School of Economics)H-Index: 28
There is a longstanding debate about whether culture shapes regimes or regimes shape culture. New research by Ruck et al. resolves the debate in favor of culture’s causal primacy.
Source
#1Steven V. MillerH-Index: 6
#2Nicholas T. DavisH-Index: 1
Last. Nicholas T. DavisH-Index: 4
view all 2 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Hock Eam Lim (UUM: Universiti Utara Malaysia)H-Index: 6
#2Daigee Shaw (Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica)H-Index: 1
Last. Hongbo Duan (Hebei University)H-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
During the last two decades, economic studies on happiness have grown rapidly in particular, studies on the effect of income on happiness. Ng (Pac Econ Rev 7(1):51–63, 2002) has highlighted the East-Asian happiness gap. The East Asian countries, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Singapore, are performing well economically, however, performing poorly in happiness. Societal values have been suggested to be the potential explanation of this happiness gap. Nevertheless, the effects of societal...
1 CitationsSource
Source
#1Michael Minkov (UT: University of Tartu)H-Index: 1
#2Christian WelzelH-Index: 28
Last. Michael SchachnerH-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
Numerous studies have reported a positive individual-level association between happiness and two psychologically distinct states of mind: religious faith and subjective freedom (a feeling of life control). Although the strength of these relationships varies across countries, no general pattern driving this variation has been shown so far. After surveying 40,534 randomly selected respondents from 43 nations, we find that in countries where happiness is more closely related to religious faith, it ...
Source
#1Takashi Inoguchi (J. F. Oberlin University)H-Index: 19
#2Lien Thi Quynh LeH-Index: 2
This chapter shows the rankings of global quasi-legislation behavior of 193 sovereign states and ten geo-historico-cultural groups (Sub-Saharan Africa, Sinic East, Returned West, Reformed West, Orthodox East, New West, Latin America, Islamic East, Indic East) on three dimensions, i.e., agile vs cautious (speed), global commons vs individual citizens’ interests (angle), aspirational bonding vs mutual binding (strategy).
Source