A comprehensive evaluation of NSFC funding programs: Based on Vague set and multi-criteria decision-making
Abstract
This paper presents a multi-criteria decision-making method based on Vague sets to evaluate the eleven main competitive research funding programs of the National Natural Science Foundation of China( NSFC). Firstly,panels of NSFC were asked to evaluate these funding programsby a questionnaire according to four criteria: assessment fairness,management normalization,scientific innovation,and social influence.Three linguistic terms,HIGH,LOWor...
Paper Details
Title
A comprehensive evaluation of NSFC funding programs: Based on Vague set and multi-criteria decision-making
Published Date
Jan 1, 2015
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History