To what extent do learners benefit from indirect written corrective feedback? A study targeting learners of different proficiency and heritage language status
Abstract
Should teachers spend hours correcting students’ errors, or should they simply underline the errors, leaving it up to the students to self-correct them? The current study examines the utility of indirect feedback on learners’ written output. Journal entries from students enrolled in intact second language (L2) Korean classes ( n = 40) were collected and returned to the students with all of their errors underlined (indirect feedback). The...
Paper Details
Title
To what extent do learners benefit from indirect written corrective feedback? A study targeting learners of different proficiency and heritage language status
Published Date
Aug 2, 2016
Journal
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
678 - 699
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History