Match!

Assessment of indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected in lung cancer screening: Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT

Published on Jul 1, 2016in Lung Cancer4.60
· DOI :10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.04.025
María José García-Velloso18
Estimated H-index: 18
(University of Navarra),
Gorka Bastarrika31
Estimated H-index: 31
(University of Navarra)
+ 9 AuthorsJavier J. Zulueta32
Estimated H-index: 32
(University of Navarra)
Abstract
Abstract Background A major drawback of lung cancer screening programs is the high frequency of false-positive findings on computed tomography (CT). We investigated the accuracy of selective 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy- d -glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) scan in assessing radiologically indeterminate lung nodules detected in lung cancer screening. Methods FDG PET/CT was performed to characterize 64 baseline lung nodules >10 mm and 36 incidence nodules detected on low-dose CT screening in asymptomatic current or former smokers (83 men, age range 40–83 years) at high risk for lung cancer. CT images were acquired without intravenous contrast. Nodules were analyzed by size, density, and metabolic activity and visual scored on a 5-point scale for FDG uptake. Nodules were classified as negative for malignancy when no FDG uptake was observed, or positive when focal uptake was observed in the visual analysis, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured. Final diagnosis was based on histopathological evaluation or at least 24 months of follow-up. Results A total of 100 nodules were included. The prevalence of lung cancer was 1%. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of visual analysis to detect malignancy were 84%, 95%, 91%, and 91%, respectively, with an accuracy of 91% (AUC 0.893). FDG PET/CT accurately detected 31 malignant tumors (diameters 9–42 mm, SUVmax range 0.6–14.2) and was falsely negative in 6 patients. With SUVmax thresholds for malignancy of 1.5, 2, and 2.5, specificity was 97% but sensitivity decreased to 65%, 49%, and 46% respectively, and accuracy decreased to 85%, 79%, and 78% respectively (AUC 0.872). Conclusions The visual analysis of FDG PET/CT scan is highly accurate in characterizing indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected in lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Semi-quantitative analysis does not improve the accuracy of FDG PET/CT over that obtained with a qualitative method for lung nodule characterization.
  • References (30)
  • Citations (9)
References30
Newest
#1Wenbo Li (CQMU: Chongqing Medical University)H-Index: 3
#2Hua Pang (CQMU: Chongqing Medical University)H-Index: 3
Last.Jing Zhou (CQMU: Chongqing Medical University)H-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
#1Giulia Veronesi (IEO: European Institute of Oncology)H-Index: 32
#2Laura Lavinia Travaini (IEO: European Institute of Oncology)H-Index: 16
Last.Giovanni Paganelli (IEO: European Institute of Oncology)H-Index: 66
view all 8 authors...
#1John K. Field (University of Liverpool)H-Index: 65
#2Rob J. van KlaverenH-Index: 40
Last.Harry J. de Koning (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 71
view all 9 authors...
Cited By9
Newest
#1Xinguan Yang (Guangzhou Medical University)H-Index: 2
#2JianxingHe (Guangzhou Medical University)H-Index: 21
Last.Yubao Guan (Guangzhou Medical University)H-Index: 2
view all 7 authors...
View next paperAnalysis on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Cancer by Integrating CT and SUVmax of ~(18)F-FDG PET