Match!

A fuzzy-hybrid analytic model to assess investors' perceptions for industry selection

Published on Jun 1, 2016
· DOI :10.1016/j.dss.2016.03.005
Hasan Dinçer9
Estimated H-index: 9
,
Ümit Hacıoğlu8
Estimated H-index: 8
+ 1 AuthorsDursun Delen32
Estimated H-index: 32
(Oklahoma State University–Tulsa)
Abstract
The 2008-2009 global financial crisis and its subsequent ramifications on capital markets have led to an increasing attention on the importance of cognitive and behavioral issues in finance. The purpose of this study is to determine the ranking of the industry alternatives for portfolio investments based on individual investors' perceptions. Accordingly, a hybrid analytic multi-criteria decision model (MCDM)-based on the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the Fuzzy Technique for the Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) methods along with sensitivity analysis-is developed to identify and rank-order the best performing industry options. The proposed model is applied to Borsa Istanbul Stock Exchange 100 Index (BIST 100) in Turkey. The results indicate that (i) the investors' perceptions on market conditions and global financial situation influence their industry selection on company stocks; (ii) the investors' perceptions on portfolio investments rely heavily on performance and risk levels of individual asset/stocks, and (iii) traded stocks of financial industry (along with its sub-industries) have greater performance expectations than those of the ones in other industries such as technology, services and tourism. Economic instability is increasing the importance of cognitive/behavioral issues in finance.Investors' perception influences industry selection decision for investments.Investors' perception on portfolio investments relies heavily on performance and risk of individual asset.Use of a fuzzy-hybrid methodology improves the financial decision outcomes.Fuzzy logic, AHP and TOPSIS are collectively and synergistically used in this study.
  • References (103)
  • Citations (16)
References103
Newest
#1Sangcheol Song (""St. Joe's"": Saint Joseph's University)H-Index: 10
#2Seung Hyun Lee (UTD: University of Texas at Dallas)H-Index: 21
Last.Mona Makhija (Max M. Fisher College of Business)H-Index: 10
view all 3 authors...
#1Ksenija Mandic (University of Belgrade)H-Index: 4
#2Boris Delibasic (University of Belgrade)H-Index: 9
Last.Sladjana Benkovic (University of Belgrade)H-Index: 4
view all 4 authors...
#1Huseyin Selcuk Kilic (Marmara University)H-Index: 9
#2Selim Zaim (ITU: Istanbul Technical University)H-Index: 6
Last.Dursun Delen (Oklahoma State University–Tulsa)H-Index: 32
view all 3 authors...
Cited By16
Newest
#1Yang Gao (National University of Defense Technology)
#2Dong-sheng Li (National University of Defense Technology)
Last.Hua Zhong (National University of Defense Technology)
view all 0 authors...
#1Hing Kai Chan (UNNC: The University of Nottingham Ningbo China)H-Index: 38
#2Xuting Sun (SHU: Shanghai University)
Last.Sai-Ho Chung (PolyU: Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
view all 0 authors...
#1Solomie A. Gebrezgabher (IWMI: International Water Management Institute)H-Index: 5
#2Avinandan Taron (TISS: Tata Institute of Social Sciences)H-Index: 1
Last.Sena Amewu (IWMI: International Water Management Institute)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
View next paperStudy on the Selection Methods of Financial Technology of Financial Professionals