NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity

eLife7.70
Volume: 5
Published: Feb 16, 2016
Abstract
Peer review is widely used to assess grant applications so that the highest ranked applications can be funded. A number of studies have questioned the ability of peer review panels to predict the productivity of applications, but a recent analysis of grants funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the US found that the percentile scores awarded by peer review panels correlated with productivity as measured by citations of...
Paper Details
Title
NIH peer review percentile scores are poorly predictive of grant productivity
Published Date
Feb 16, 2016
Journal
Volume
5
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.