Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy

Volume: 45, Issue: 1, Pages: 251 - 260
Published: Feb 1, 2016
Abstract
Background: Although several public health organizations have recommended population-wide reduction in salt intake, the evidence on the population benefits remains unclear. We conducted a metaknowledge analysis of the literature on salt intake and health outcomes. Methods: We identified reports—primary studies, systematic reviews, guidelines and comments, letters or reviews—addressing the effect of sodium intake on cerebro-cardiovascular disease...
Paper Details
Title
Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy
Published Date
Feb 1, 2016
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
251 - 260
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.