Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles

Volume: 107, Issue: 1, Pages: 15 - 26
Published: Feb 2, 2016
Abstract
Number of researchers, journals and articles has significantly increased in the last few years and peer review is still the most reliable instrument to sort out innovative, valuable, scientifically sound null from the pool of submitted results. Editors and publishers join their efforts to improve peer review process and to be able to do so properly, they need field information from contributors. Editorial board of the Journal of the Serbian...
Paper Details
Title
Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles
Published Date
Feb 2, 2016
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
15 - 26
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.