Match!

A Target-Oriented Approach: A 'One-Size' Model to Suit Humans and Econs Behaviors

Published on Jan 1, 2015in Applied mathematical sciences
· DOI :10.2139/SSRN.2354058
Robert F. Bordley4
Estimated H-index: 4
,
Luisa Tibiletti9
Estimated H-index: 9
(UNITO: University of Turin),
Mariacristina Uberti4
Estimated H-index: 4
(UNITO: University of Turin)
Abstract
Thaler and Sunstein (2008) introduce two stereotypical decision makers: the Econs, imaginary people who always behave as strictly rational expected utility maximizers, and the Humans, real people subject to ordinary behavioral biases. This note sheds light on how the axiomatic target-oriented approach introduced by Castagnoli and Li Calzi (1996) may fit well the behavior of both of them. We show that although Econs and Humans use a different language, they maximize the same functional, e.g. the probability of meeting the goal. So declaring the probability distribution of the goal permits to elicit the agent value function. A number of different distributions for goals are discussed and the family of the skew normal ones is proposed for its user-friendly flexibility. We show how moving the skewness parameter along its range every stereotypical decision maker’s profile may be modelled.
  • References (16)
  • Citations (3)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1995UAI: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
2 Citations
1991
1 Author (Karl H. Schlag)
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References16
Newest
#1Robert F. Bordley (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 4
#2Luisa Tibiletti (UNITO: University of Turin)H-Index: 9
Last. Mariacristina Uberti (UNITO: University of Turin)H-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
According to the behavioral finance theory, agents act coherently with the Kahneman and Tversky prospect paradigms and may violate those dictated by the rational expected utility. From the point of view of real financial markets’ applications, a key question concerns how to eliciting the financial professionals’ risk preferences. In this contribution we propose the benchmarking procedure originally set up by Castagnoli and LiCalzi (1996) and Bordley and LiCalzi (2000) that couples sound axiomati...
1 CitationsSource
#1Adelchi Azzalini (UNIPD: University of Padua)H-Index: 30
#2Antonella Capitanio (UNIBO: University of Bologna)H-Index: 6
Interest in the skew-normal and related families of distributions has grown enormously over recent years, as theory has advanced, challenges of data have grown, and computational tools have made substantial progress. This comprehensive treatment, blending theory and practice, will be the standard resource for statisticians and applied researchers. Assuming only basic knowledge of (non-measure-theoretic) probability and statistical inference, the book is accessible to the wide range of researcher...
200 Citations
#1Bas Donkers (Erasmus Research Institute of Management)H-Index: 25
#2C.J. Lourenco (USC: University of South Carolina)H-Index: 1
Last. Daniel G. Goldstein (LBS: London Business School)H-Index: 33
view all 4 authors...
In this paper we propose the use of preferred outcome distributions as a new method to elicit individuals' value and probability weighting functions in decisions under risk. Extant approaches for the elicitation of these two key ingredients of individuals' risk attitude typically rely on a long, chained sequence of lottery choices. In contrast, preferred outcome distributions can be elicited through an intuitive graphical interface, and, as we show, the information contained in two preferred out...
3 CitationsSource
#1Martin Eling (HSG: University of St. Gallen)H-Index: 27
This paper analyzes whether the skew-normal and skew-student distributions recently discussed in the finance literature are reasonable models for describing claims in property-liability insurance. We consider two well-known datasets from actuarial science and fit a number of parametric distributions to these data. Also the non-parametric transformation kernel approach is considered as a benchmark model. We find that the skew-normal and skew-student are reasonably competitive compared to other mo...
83 CitationsSource
A common precept of decision analysis under uncertainty is the choice of an action which maximizes the expected value of a utility function. Savage's (1954) axioms for subjective expected utility provide a normative foundation for this principle of choice. This paper shows that the same set of axioms implies that one should select an action which maximizes the probability of meeting an uncertain target. This suggests a new perspective and an alternate target-based language for decision analysis....
139 CitationsSource
#1Chip Heath (Duke University)H-Index: 4
#2Richard P. Larrick (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 33
Last. George Wu (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 20
view all 3 authors...
We argue that goals serve as reference points and alter outcomes in a manner consistent with the value function of Prospect Theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1992). We present new evidence that goals inherit the properties of the value function—not only a reference point, but also loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity. We also use the value function to explain previous empirical results in the goal literature on affect, effort, persistence, and performance. ≈ 1999 Academi...
569 CitationsSource
This paper advances an interpretation of Von Neumann–Morgenstern’s expected utility model for preferences over lotteries which does not require the notion of a cardinal utility over prizes and can be phrased entirely in the language of probability. According to it, the expected utility of a lottery can be read as the probability that this lottery outperforms another given independent lottery. The implications of this interpretation for some topics and models in decision theory are considered.
102 CitationsSource
#1Amos Tversky (Stanford University)H-Index: 94
#1TverskyAmos (Stanford University)
Last. Daniel Kahneman (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 116
view all 2 authors...
Much experimental evidence indicates that choice depends on the status quo or reference level: changes of reference point often lead to reversals of preference. We present a reference-dependent theory of consumer choice, which explains such effects by a deformation of indifference curves about the reference point. The central assumption of the theory is that losses and disadvantages have greater impact on preferences than gains and advantages. Implications of loss aversion for economic behavior ...
3,773 CitationsSource
#1Charles F. Manski (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 62
This paper studies two models of rational behavior under uncertainty whose predictions are invariant under ordinal transformations of utility. The ‘quantile utility’ model assumes that the agent maximizes some quantile of the distribution of utility. The ‘utility mass’ model assumes maximization of the probability of obtaining an outcome whose utility is higher than some fixed critical value. Both models satisfy weak stochastic dominance. Lexicographic refinements satisfy strong dominance.
51 CitationsSource
On introduit une nouvelle classe de fonctions de densite dependant du parametre de forme λ, telles que λ=0 corresponde a la densite normale standard
1,744 Citations
Cited By3
Newest
#1Fabio Zagonari (UNIBO: University of Bologna)H-Index: 11
This paper identifies the globally stable conditions under which an individual facing the same choice in many subsequent times learns to behave as prescribed by the expected-utility model. To do so, the analysis moves from the relevant behavioural models suggested by psychology (i.e., weighted probabilities applied to regret and rejoice theory), and by updating probability estimations and outcome preferences according to the learning models suggested by neuroscience (i.e., adaptive learning aime...
Source
#1Robert F. Bordley (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 4
#2Luisa Tibiletti (UNITO: University of Turin)H-Index: 9
Last. Mariacristina Uberti (UNITO: University of Turin)H-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
According to the behavioral finance theory, agents act coherently with the Kahneman and Tversky prospect paradigms and may violate those dictated by the rational expected utility. From the point of view of real financial markets’ applications, a key question concerns how to eliciting the financial professionals’ risk preferences. In this contribution we propose the benchmarking procedure originally set up by Castagnoli and LiCalzi (1996) and Bordley and LiCalzi (2000) that couples sound axiomati...
1 CitationsSource
#1Robert F. Bordley (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 4
#2Francesca Culasso (UNITO: University of Turin)H-Index: 5
Last. Luisa Tibiletti (UNITO: University of Turin)H-Index: 9
view all 4 authors...
Recent empirical studies in Behavioral Agency Model (see Pepper and Gore, 2012) on executive compensations make evidence how the agent attitude to risk influences the subjectively perceived incentive value. The paper sets out a compensation schedule matching multiple goals: (1) aligning the incentives with the executive subjectively perceived fair and equitable compensation; (2) discouraging the executive excessive risk-taking; (3) providing an approach to calculate the certainty equivalent of t...
1 CitationsSource