Match!

Effects of Diet Composition and Insulin Resistance Status on Plasma Lipid Levels in a Weight Loss Intervention in Women

Published on Jan 13, 2016in Journal of the American Heart Association4.66
· DOI :10.1161/JAHA.115.002771
Tran Le1
Estimated H-index: 1
(UCSD: University of California, San Diego),
Shirley W. Flatt43
Estimated H-index: 43
(UCSD: University of California, San Diego)
+ 5 AuthorsCheryl L. Rock82
Estimated H-index: 82
(UCSD: University of California, San Diego)
Abstract
Background Optimal macronutrient distribution of weight loss diets has not been established. The distribution of energy from carbohydrate and fat has been observed to promote differential plasma lipid responses in previous weight loss studies, and insulin resistance status may interact with diet composition and affect weight loss and lipid responses. Methods and Results Overweight and obese women (n=245) were enrolled in a 1‐year behavioral weight loss intervention and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 study groups: a lower fat (20% energy), higher carbohydrate (65% energy) diet; a lower carbohydrate (45% energy), higher fat (35% energy) diet; or a walnut‐rich, higher fat (35% energy), lower carbohydrate (45% energy) diet. Blood samples and data available from 213 women at baseline and at 6 months were the focus of this analysis. Triglycerides, total cholesterol, and high‐ and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were quantified and compared between and within groups. Triglycerides decreased in all study arms at 6 months ( P <0.05). The walnut‐rich diet increased high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol more than either the lower fat or lower carbohydrate diet ( P <0.05). The walnut‐rich diet also reduced low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol in insulin‐sensitive women, whereas the lower fat diet reduced both total cholesterol and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol in insulin‐sensitive women ( P< 0.05). Insulin sensitivity and C‐reactive protein levels also improved. Conclusions Weight loss was similar across the diet groups, although insulin‐sensitive women lost more weight with a lower fat, higher carbohydrate diet versus a higher fat, lower carbohydrate diet. The walnut‐rich, higher fat diet resulted in the most favorable changes in lipid levels. Clinical Trial Registration URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT01424007][1]. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01424007&atom=%2Fahaoa%2F5%2F1%2Fe002771.atom
  • References (31)
  • Citations (19)
References31
Newest
#1Caroline S. FoxH-Index: 133
Last.Dorothea K. VafiadisH-Index: 10
view all 19 authors...
152 CitationsSource
#1A Austel (GAU: University of Göttingen)H-Index: 1
#2C. Ranke (GAU: University of Göttingen)H-Index: 2
Last.T Ellrott (GAU: University of Göttingen)H-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
8 CitationsSource
19 CitationsSource
#1Qiuping GuH-Index: 7
#2Ryne Paulose-RamH-Index: 16
Last.Brian K. KitH-Index: 25
view all 4 authors...
88 Citations
#1Robert H. EckelH-Index: 97
#2John M. JakicicH-Index: 66
Last.Susan Z. YanovskiH-Index: 54
view all 16 authors...
1,206 CitationsSource
569 CitationsSource
#1Penny M. Kris-Etherton (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 89
34 CitationsSource
76 CitationsSource
2,681 CitationsSource
#1Yu-Lan Chiang (LLU: Loma Linda University)H-Index: 1
#2Ella Haddad (LLU: Loma Linda University)H-Index: 21
Last.Joan Sabaté (LLU: Loma Linda University)H-Index: 46
view all 5 authors...
25 CitationsSource
Cited By19
Newest
#1Selene Yue Xu (UCSD: University of California, San Diego)H-Index: 1
#2Sandahl H. Nelson (SDSU: San Diego State University)H-Index: 6
Last.Loki Natarajan (UCSD: University of California, San Diego)H-Index: 49
view all 10 authors...
Source
Source
#1Mary Yannakoulia (UoA: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)H-Index: 3
#2Dimitrios Poulimeneas (UoA: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)H-Index: 2
Last.Costas A. Anastasiou (UoA: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)H-Index: 14
view all 4 authors...
4 CitationsSource
#1Teuta Gjuladin-Hellon (LJMU: Liverpool John Moores University)H-Index: 1
#2Ian Davies (LJMU: Liverpool John Moores University)H-Index: 21
Last.Raziyeh Amiri Baghbadorani (LJMU: Liverpool John Moores University)H-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Yoona KimH-Index: 6
#2Jennifer B. KeoghH-Index: 40
Last.Peter M. CliftonH-Index: 72
view all 3 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Hang Li (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 1
#2Xia Li (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 4
Last.Jinping Lu (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 4
view all 5 authors...
10 CitationsSource
#1Cornelia M. Ulrich (UofU: University of Utah)H-Index: 69
#2Caroline Himbert (UofU: University of Utah)H-Index: 4
Last.Stephen D. Hursting (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 52
view all 4 authors...
14 CitationsSource
#1Alison M. Coates (UniSA: University of South Australia)H-Index: 27
#2Alison M. Hill (UniSA: University of South Australia)H-Index: 17
Last.Sze Yen Tan (Deakin University)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Asmaa Abdelhamid (UEA: University of East Anglia)H-Index: 15
#2Tracey J Brown (UEA: University of East Anglia)H-Index: 10
Last.Lee Hooper (UEA: University of East Anglia)H-Index: 54
view all 12 authors...
55 CitationsSource
#1Asmaa Abdelhamid (UEA: University of East Anglia)H-Index: 15
#2Nicole Martin (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 5
Last.Lee Hooper (UEA: University of East Anglia)H-Index: 54
view all 12 authors...
19 CitationsSource