The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus

Volume: 10, Issue: 1, Pages: 174 - 182
Published: Feb 1, 2016
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that the Scopus bibliometric database is probably less accurate than one thinks. As a further evidence of this fact, this paper presents a structured collection of several weird typologies of database errors, which can therefore be classified as horrors. Some of them concern the incorrect indexing of so-called Online-First paper, duplicate publications, and the missing/incorrect indexing of references. A crucial point...
Paper Details
Title
The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus
Published Date
Feb 1, 2016
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
174 - 182
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.