Match!

Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview

Published on Dec 1, 2016in Health Economics Review
· DOI :10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x
Axel C. Mühlbacher16
Estimated H-index: 16
,
Anika Kaczynski5
Estimated H-index: 5
+ 1 AuthorsF. Reed Johnson35
Estimated H-index: 35
(Duke University)
Cite
Abstract
Best-worst scaling (BWS), also known as maximum-difference scaling, is a multiattribute approach to measuring preferences. BWS aims at the analysis of preferences regarding a set of attributes, their levels or alternatives. It is a stated-preference method based on the assumption that respondents are capable of making judgments regarding the best and the worst (or the most and least important, respectively) out of three or more elements of a choice-set. As is true of discrete choice experiments (DCE) generally, BWS avoids the known weaknesses of rating and ranking scales while holding the promise of generating additional information by making respondents choose twice, namely the best as well as the worst criteria. A systematic literature review found 53 BWS applications in health and healthcare. This article expounds possibilities of application, the underlying theoretical concepts and the implementation of BWS in its three variants: ‘object case’, ‘profile case’, ‘multiprofile case’. This paper contains a survey of BWS methods and revolves around study design, experimental design, and data analysis. Moreover the article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the three types of BWS distinguished and offered an outlook. A companion paper focuses on special issues of theory and statistical inference confronting BWS in preference measurement.
  • References (94)
  • Citations (23)
Cite
References94
Newest
#1Holly Peay (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 14
#2Ilene L. Hollin (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 9
Last.John F. P. Bridges (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 27
view all 3 authors...
#1Gisselle Gallego (University of Western Sydney)H-Index: 14
#2Angela Dew (UNSW: University of New South Wales)H-Index: 16
Last.Craig Veitch (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 18
view all 8 authors...
#1Kathleen Yan (Yale University)H-Index: 2
#2John F. P. Bridges (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 27
Last.Liana Fraenkel (Yale University)H-Index: 31
view all 6 authors...
#1Wynne Morrison (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 17
#2James Womer (TU: Temple University)H-Index: 6
Last.Chris Feudtner (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 53
view all 7 authors...
#1Susan dosReis (UMB: University of Maryland, Baltimore)H-Index: 27
#2Xinyi Ng (UMB: University of Maryland, Baltimore)H-Index: 3
Last.John F. P. Bridges (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 27
view all 6 authors...
Cited By23
Newest
#1Hideo Aizaki (Hokkaido University)H-Index: 1
#2James Fogarty (UWA: University of Western Australia)H-Index: 9
#1Peter Loewen (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 11
#2Nick Bansback (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 32
Last.J. MacGillivray (Vancouver General Hospital)H-Index: 2
view all 10 authors...
#1Kei Long Cheung (Medical University of Vienna)H-Index: 5
#2Susanne Mayer (Medical University of Vienna)H-Index: 6
Last.Mickaël Hiligsmann (PHRI: Public Health Research Institute)H-Index: 27
view all 7 authors...
#1Vikas Soekhai (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 2
#2Esther W. de Bekker-Grob (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 22
Last.Caroline Vass (University of Manchester)H-Index: 5
view all 4 authors...
View next paperBest--worst scaling : What it can do for health care research and how to do it.