Match!

In search of a creative space: A conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxical tensions

Published on Mar 1, 2016in Scandinavian Journal of Management
· DOI :10.1016/j.scaman.2015.12.002
Medhanie Gaim3
Estimated H-index: 3
(Umeå University),
Nils Wåhlin7
Estimated H-index: 7
(Umeå University)
Sources
Abstract
We examine paradoxes in organizations and the organizations’ ability to deal with the resulting paradoxical tensions. Paradoxes constitute contradictory yet interrelated organizational demands that exist simultaneously, with the resulting tensions persisting over time. Irrespective of the prevailing evidence that engaging paradoxes leads to peak performance in the short-term, which reinforces long-term success, the question of how this might be done remains perplexing. Thus, based on pragmatic philosophy, this paper aims to increase our understanding of what constitutes a paradox and suggests a conceptual framework from which organizations and their members can frame and cope with tensions that result from paradoxes. Specifically, we conceptually map a way to achieve a synthesis of paradoxical tensions that is informed by design thinking. This synthesis is said to occur when competing demands are simultaneously fulfilled to their full potential. In this paper, design thinking – as a management concept – is used to refer to the interplay between perspective, structure, process, and mindset. It provides an alternative framing of how organizations approach paradoxes and deal with the resulting tensions.
  • References (80)
  • Citations (25)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
972 Citations
1,022 Citations
181 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References80
Newest
#1Wendy K. Smith (UD: University of Delaware)H-Index: 22
181 CitationsSource
#1Claudy Jules (Accenture)H-Index: 3
#2Darren Good (Pepperdine University)H-Index: 7
17 CitationsSource
#1Marianne W. Lewis (UC: University of Cincinnati)H-Index: 25
#2Wendy K. Smith (UD: University of Delaware)H-Index: 22
Organizations are rife with tensions—flexibility versus control, exploration versus exploitation, autocracy versus democracy, social versus financial, global versus local. Researchers have long responded using contingency theory, asking “Under what conditions should managers emphasize either A or B?” Yet increasingly studies apply a paradox perspective, shifting the question to “How can we engage both A and B simultaneously?” Despite accumulating exemplars, commonalities across paradox studies r...
121 CitationsSource
An extensive amount of literature has proposed a number of ways for firms to achieve strategic innovation. Of the different approaches suggested, one that deserves more attention is paradox resolution. Despite the growing amount of evidence showing the benefits of managing seemingly diametrically opposed demands, a limited amount of empirical research connects the management of paradoxical tensions to strategic innovation. This paper aims to partially fill this research gap by first reviewing th...
19 CitationsSource
#1Charles A. O'Reilly (Stanford University)H-Index: 62
#2Michael L. Tushman (Harvard University)H-Index: 70
Organizational ambidexterity refers to the ability of an organization to both explore and exploit—to compete in mature technologies and markets where efficiency, control, and incremental improvement are prized and to also compete in new technologies and markets where flexibility, autonomy, and experimentation are needed. In the past 15 years there has been an explosion of interest and research on this topic. We briefly review the current state of the research, highlighting what we know and don't...
520 CitationsSource
This paper takes a critical look at the design thinking discourse, one that has different meanings depending on its context. Within the managerial realm, design thinking has been described as the best way to be creative and innovate, while within the design realm, design thinking may be partly ignored and taken for granted, despite a long history of academic development and debate. In the design area, we find five different discourses of ‘designerly thinking’, or ways to describe what designers ...
199 CitationsSource
#1Paula Jarzabkowski (Cornell University)H-Index: 37
#2Jane K. Lê (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 10
Last. Andrew H. Van de Ven (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 53
view all 3 authors...
This article develops an empirically grounded process model of how managers in organizations respond to coexisting paradoxical tensions. With a longitudinal real-time study, we examine how a telecommunications firm copes with an organizing paradox between market and regulatory demands and how this paradox influences belonging and performing paradoxes for managers. These paradoxes coevolve over time as managers shift from defensive responses that attempt to circumvent paradox to active responses ...
142 CitationsSource
#1Lisa CarlgrenH-Index: 7
This thesis deals with the concept of Design thinking (DT) and the building of innovation capabilities. DT has emerged as a management concept promising innovation inspired by design. However, the concept is poorly conceptualized and scarcely investigated in organizational settings, especially in relation to its potential role as an enabler of innovation. Building on empirical studies of companies claiming to use DT, the thesis aims at providing a better understanding of the concept, how it is u...
21 Citations
#1Lucy Kimbell (Royal College of Art)H-Index: 8
ABSTRACTThe term design thinking has gained attention over the past decade in a wide range of contexts beyond the traditional preoccupations of designers. The main idea is that the ways professional designers problem-solve is of value to firms trying to innovate and to societies trying to make change happen. This paper reviews the origins of the term design thinking in research about designers and its adoption by management educators and consultancies within a dynamic, global mediatized economy....
198 CitationsSource
#1Stephan van Dijk (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 2
#2Hans Berends (TU/e: Eindhoven University of Technology)H-Index: 12
Last. Mathieu Weggeman (TU/e: Eindhoven University of Technology)H-Index: 12
view all 5 authors...
Institutional theory emphasizes the institutional constraints that render radical innovations illegitimate, but fails to explain how such innovations might succeed. Adopting a micro-institutional perspective, this paper addresses why and how embedded agency may overcome legitimacy crises within established systems. Drawing on a sample of 20 legitimacy problems identified in five radical innovation trajectories at two mature companies, we develop an empirically grounded theory of the institutiona...
58 CitationsSource
Cited By25
Newest
#1Päivi Karhu (Lappeenranta University of Technology)H-Index: 2
#2Paavo Ritala (Lappeenranta University of Technology)H-Index: 30
In making decisions about strategic and operational actions, managers commonly need to consider dualities such as long-term versus short-term, innovation versus tradition, and stability versus change. As these dualities often entail contradictory objectives, paradoxical tensions may arise in their pursuit. Despite growing interest in this topic, the extant literature offers little guidance on how paradoxical framing can be used to understand these tensions. To address this gap, a qualitative stu...
2 CitationsSource
#1Nunzia Coco (Ca' Foscari University of Venice)
#2Monica Calcagno (Ca' Foscari University of Venice)H-Index: 4
Last. Maria Lusiani (Ca' Foscari University of Venice)H-Index: 6
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Jacob Brix (AAU: Aalborg University)H-Index: 6
#1Jacob Brix (AAU: Aalborg University)
Abstract In this study, I investigate how a European company with a 50-year history creating and producing polymer products completed an entire innovation project that was being implemented as part of a new, sustainability-oriented strategy. The aim of the new corporate strategy was twofold. The first aim was to recognize new sustainable opportunities and to translate these opportunities into concrete products or services that could be commercialized. The second aim was to build the organization...
Source
#1Wojciech Czakon (Jagiellonian University)H-Index: 3
#2Patrycja Klimas (Wrocław University of Economics)
Last. Marcello M. Mariani (University of Reading)H-Index: 15
view all 3 authors...
Abstract This study taps into managers' perceptions of coopetition antecedents to better understand why firms adopt coopetition. By analyzing and synthesizing findings from systematic reviews of coopetition literature we integrate knowledge on coopetition antecedents. We develop and validate a scale measuring behavioral coopetition antecedents: strategic rationale and coopetition mindset. Based on a random sample of 368 Polish tourism firms, we run exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to...
5 CitationsSource
#1Wojciech Czakon (Jagiellonian University)H-Index: 18
#2Katarzyna Czernek-Marszałek (University of Economics in Katowice)H-Index: 2
Our study aims at understanding how coopeting tourism managers perceive their competitors. Competitor perceptions are consequential because they have implications for interfirm relationships. Colla...
1 CitationsSource
#2Merete SausH-Index: 3
view all 2 authors...
Source
#1Gail T. Fairhurst (UC: University of Cincinnati)H-Index: 33
#2Linda L. Putnam (UCSB: University of California, Santa Barbara)H-Index: 43
The study of organizational tensions, contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes is on the rise in the organizational sciences. This article sets forth an integrative methodology for studying these oppositional phenomena by aligning grounded theory techniques with the little “d” and big “D” orientations of organizational discourse analysis. This integrative methodology not only aids in identifying and determining various types of organizational oppositions and responses to them, but also fosters ...
9 CitationsSource
Research problem: Revolution Industry 4.0. forces companies to face specific competence-related, technological, organizational and even ethical challenges. The use of innovative “tools” associated with that revolution not only brings new technological challenges, opportunities to build new competitive advantages, new areas of activity, and new types of business benefits but also doubts, questions, or even pathologies and paradoxes. Sometimes, entities that do not fully understand the essence of ...
2 CitationsSource
#1Carla Curado (University of Lisbon)H-Index: 13
#2Mírian Oliveira (PUCRS: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul)H-Index: 8
Last. Marco Antunes (University of Lisbon)
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Medhanie Gaim (Umeå University)H-Index: 3
#2Nils Wåhlin (Umeå University)H-Index: 7
Last. Mattias Jacobsson (Umeå University)H-Index: 10
view all 3 authors...
It is well established that engaging paradoxes and the role of space are important aspects of idea work. Although the significance has been recognized, studies that focus on the intersection betwee ...
Source