The Causal Effects of Elite Position‐Taking on Voter Attitudes: Field Experiments with Elite Communication

Published on Jan 1, 2017in American Journal of Political Science4.354
· DOI :10.1111/ajps.12243
David E. Broockman14
Estimated H-index: 14
(Stanford University),
Daniel M. Butler15
Estimated H-index: 15
(WashU: Washington University in St. Louis)
Influential theories depict politicians as, alternatively, strongly constrained by public opinion, able to shape public opinion with persuasive appeals, or relatively unconstrained by public opinion and able to shape it merely by announcing their positions. To test these theories, we conducted unique field experiments in cooperation with sitting politicians in which U.S. state legislators sent constituents official communications with randomly assigned content. The legislators sometimes stated their issue positions in these letters, sometimes supported by extensive arguments but sometimes minimally justified; in many cases, these issue positions were at odds with voters’. An ostensibly unrelated survey found that voters often adopted the positions legislators took, even when legislators offered little justification. Moreover, voters did not evaluate their legislators more negatively when representatives took positions these voters had previously opposed, again regardless of whether legislators provided justifications. The findings are consistent with theories suggesting voters often defer to politicians’ policy judgments.
  • References (35)
  • Citations (33)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1 Author (John Zaller)
4,446 Citations
245 Citations
5 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1G FindleyMichaelH-Index: 19
#2Brock LaneyH-Index: 1
Last. Jason Campbell SharmanH-Index: 18
view all 4 authors...
By comparing parallel field and survey experiments testing compliance with international standards on corporate transparency, we highlight potential problems in the external validity of survey experimental designs. We performed a field experiment using deception in which we requested an anonymous business incorporation from nearly 4,000 corporate service providers in more than 180 countries. Subsequently, we conducted a survey experiment with the same providers using similar treatment conditions...
4 CitationsSource
#1Michael Tesler (UCI: University of California, Irvine)H-Index: 10
Prior research provides limited insights into when political communications prime or change citizens’ underlying opinions. This article helps fill that void by putting forth an account of priming and opinion change. I argue that crystallized attitudes should often be primed by new information. An influx of attention to less crystallized preferences, however, should lead individuals to alter their underlying opinions in accordance with prior beliefs. Since predispositions acquired early in the li...
45 CitationsSource
#1R GroseChristian (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 12
#2Neil Malhotra (Stanford University)H-Index: 26
Last. Robert P. Van Houweling (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 8
view all 3 authors...
Legislators claim that how they explain their votes matters as much as or more than the roll calls themselves. However, few studies have systematically examined legislators’ explanations and citizen attitudes in response to these explanations. We theorize that legislators strategically tailor explanations to constituents in order to compensate for policy choices that are incongruent with constituent preferences, and to reinforce policy choices that are congruent. We conduct a within-subjects fie...
43 CitationsSource
#1William Minozzi (OSU: Ohio State University)H-Index: 8
#2Michael A. Neblo (OSU: Ohio State University)H-Index: 13
Last. David Lazer (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 37
view all 4 authors...
Do leaders persuade? Social scientists have long studied the relationship between elite behavior and mass opinion. However, there is surprisingly little evidence regarding direct persuasion by leaders. Here we show that political leaders can persuade their constituents directly on three dimensions: substantive attitudes regarding policy issues, attributions regarding the leaders’ qualities, and subsequent voting behavior. We ran two randomized controlled field experiments testing the causal effe...
15 CitationsSource
#1Adam J. Berinsky (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 24
#2Gabriel S. Lenz (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 13
In the early 1950s, politicians apparently allowed themselves to be spectators to the anticommunist witch hunt of Senator Joe McCarthy and his supporters, leading to a particularly grim chapter in American politics. In part, they did so because they thought the public supported McCarthy. Although politicians lacked contemporary public opinion data, they apparently inferred McCarthy�s support from key Senate race outcomes. The few senators who initially stood up to McCarthy lost their reelections...
5 CitationsSource
#1Timothy J. Ryan (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 7
Political scientists commonly distinguish issues that are moral from ones that are not. The distinction is taken to be important for understanding persuadability, the stability of opinions, and issue salience, among other phenomena, but there are inconsistencies in how scholars have conceived it. Drawing insights from psychology, I suggest that it is fruitful to think about moral conviction as a dimension of attitude strength. Using three data sources, I examine how much this perspective contrib...
48 CitationsSource
#1Todd Rogers (Harvard University)H-Index: 19
#2David W. Nickerson (ND: University of Notre Dame)H-Index: 22
Can independent groups change voters' beliefs about an incumbent's positions? And, does reframing how candidates' are perceived by changing beliefs about their positions influence actual vote choices? Past laboratory and observational research suggests that candidate reframing is difficult and of little consequence because the messages must be believed despite competing messages, counter-framing and misinformation. We report the results of a field experiment conducted during a highly competitive...
7 CitationsSource
Most research on political representation focuses on how citizens’ ideology and partisanship influence their support for political candidates – leaving the question of whether (and how) elected officials influence citizens’ positions on political issues open to debate. The hypothesis tested here – using a unique, quasi-experimental design with American National Election Study data between 1956 and 2004 – is that Democratic representatives shift the opinions of constituents in the pro-Democratic ...
6 CitationsSource
245 CitationsSource
Should party leadership candidates communicate their policy positions to the party’s electorate? And should they do so when their own ideal position is outside their party’s mainstream? This article presents evidence from a field experiment into the communication of controversial policy positions through direct mail. Working with a front-running campaign during the race for the leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada, we randomly assigned a subset of convention delegates to receive a direct ma...
10 CitationsSource
Cited By33
AbstractThis article analyses the influence that political parties exert upon citizens’ opinions about European Union issues. By measuring at the same time the content and source effects on politic...
#1Benjamin Carl Krag Egerod (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)
#2Martin Vinæs Larsen (AU: Aarhus University)H-Index: 8
Last. Martin M. Larsen (AU: Aarhus University)H-Index: 17
view all 2 authors...
Municipal governments supposedly empower citizens, giving them the ability to shape the political organization of their local community. In spite of this, we know little about whether municipal gov...
Recent scholarship on inequality and political representation argues that economic elites are dominating democratic policy-making, yet it struggles to explain the underlying mechanisms. This articl...
#1Nicholas Haas (NYU: New York University)
#2Prabin B. Khadka (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 1
#1Thomas J. Leeper (LSE: London School of Economics and Political Science)H-Index: 9
#2Joshua Robison (AU: Aarhus University)H-Index: 5
The nature of democratic governance is intimately connected with how citizens respond to candidate position taking. But when will a generally uninformed public base its vote choices on candidate positions? Since Converse scholars have argued that citizens should place greater weight on candidate positions on issues they consider personally important. However, this claim has received mixed empirical support. We revisit this question with compelling new evidence. First, we expand the limited tempo...
Xenophobic violence is a fundamental obstacle to the mental, social, and economic wellbeing of international migrants living and working in South Africa. Currently, there is substantial contention ...
#1Gordon Abner (University of Texas at Austin)
#2James L. Perry (IU: Indiana University)H-Index: 43
Last. Louis Fucilla (University of Wisconsin–Whitewater)
view all 3 authors...
AbstractDespite an increase in research on how performance information regarding public agencies affects citizens’ evaluations of public agencies, we know very little about how performance informat...
#1Adam M. Dynes (BYU: Brigham Young University)H-Index: 4
#2John B. Holbein (UVA: University of Virginia)H-Index: 4
Retrospective voting is vital for democracy. But, are the objective performance metrics widely thought to be relevant for retrospection—such as the performance of the economy, criminal justice system, and schools, to name a few—valid criteria for evaluating government performance? That is, do political coalitions actually have the power to influence the performance metrics used for retrospection on the timeline introduced by elections? Using difference-in-difference and regression discontinuity ...
1 CitationsSource