How to improve the quality of peer reviews? – Three suggestions for system-level changes
Volume: 38, Pages: 263 - 273
Published: Jan 1, 2016
Abstract
Peer reviewing is critical in the process of legitimizing new scientific knowledge. Yet, concerns about its quality exist, especially if one considers developmental reviewing as an ideal. In this essay, I suggest three ways to improve review quality: provide reviewers with systematic feedback about their performance, reward active and good reviewers, and make reviewers more accountable by revealing their identities to the authors in certain...
Paper Details
Title
How to improve the quality of peer reviews? – Three suggestions for system-level changes
Published Date
Jan 1, 2016
Volume
38
Pages
263 - 273
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History