Meta‐analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews
Volume: 18, Issue: 3, Pages: 169 - 184
Published: Aug 21, 2009
Abstract
Standardized diagnostic interviews (SDIs) have become de facto gold standards for clinical research. However, because clinical practitioners seldom use SDIs, it is essential to determine how well SDIs agree with clinical diagnoses. In meta-analyses of 38 articles published from 1995 to 2006 (N = 15,967 probands), mean kappas (z-transformed) between diagnoses from clinical evaluations versus SDIs were 0.27 for a broad category of all disorders,...
Paper Details
Title
Meta‐analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews
Published Date
Aug 21, 2009
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
169 - 184
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History