Original paper
Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison
Abstract
Different scientific fields have different citation practices. Citation-based bibliometric indicators need to normalize for such differences between fields in order to allow for meaningful between-field comparisons of citation impact. Traditionally, normalization for field differences has usually been done based on a field classification system. In this approach, each publication belongs to one or more fields and the citation impact of a...
Paper Details
Title
Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison
Published Date
Nov 23, 2012
Journal
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
699 - 716
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History