002 OP: EXPLAINING DISCREPANT RESULTS FROM QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS CONCERNING HELP-SEEKING: ARE 'PUBLIC' AND 'PRIVATE' ACCOUNTS THE KEY?
Abstract
Social surveys and interviews are staple methods within health research. One of the perceived merits of the postal questionnaire is the anonymity it affords to participants, enabling people to provide honest accounts, particularly in relation to sensitive topics. Interviewing can potentially introduce bias to participants9 accounts because of a compulsion to provide socially desirable responses. Here we examine these assumptions through a...
Paper Details
Title
002 OP: EXPLAINING DISCREPANT RESULTS FROM QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS CONCERNING HELP-SEEKING: ARE 'PUBLIC' AND 'PRIVATE' ACCOUNTS THE KEY?
Published Date
Apr 12, 2015
Journal
Volume
5
Issue
4
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History