Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources

Volume: 34, Issue: 2, Pages: 209 - 220
Published: Apr 1, 2009
Abstract
This article challenges a number of assumptions underlying marking of student work in British universities. It argues that, in developing rigorous moderation procedures, we have created a huge burden for markers which adds little to accuracy and reliability but creates additional work for staff, constrains assessment choices and slows down feedback to students. In this under‐researched area of higher education, the article will explore whether...
Paper Details
Title
Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources
Published Date
Apr 1, 2009
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
209 - 220
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.