Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey
Volume: 61, Issue: 1, Pages: 9 - 12
Published: Jan 1, 2007
Abstract
Background: Peer reviewers are usually unpaid and their efforts not formally acknowledged. Some journals have difficulty finding appropriate reviewers able to complete timely reviews, resulting in publication delay. Objectives and methods: A survey of peer reviewers from five biomedical journals was conducted to determine why reviewers decline to review and their opinions on reviewer incentives. Items were scored on 5-point Likert...
Paper Details
Title
Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey
Published Date
Jan 1, 2007
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
9 - 12
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History