Magical thinking in predictions of negative events: Evidence for tempting fate but not for a protection effect
Abstract
In this paper we test two hypotheses regarding magical thinking about the perceived likelihood of future events. The first is that people believe that those who “tempt fate” by failing to take necessary precautions are more likely to suffer negative outcomes. The second is the “protection effect”, where reminding people of precautions they have taken leads them to see related risks as less likely. To this end, we describe the results from three...
Paper Details
Title
Magical thinking in predictions of negative events: Evidence for tempting fate but not for a protection effect
Published Date
Jan 1, 2013
Journal
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
45 - 54
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History