Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Including Health Interventions in the Universal Health Coverage Benefit Package in Thailand

Published on Sep 1, 2012in Value in Health5.037
· DOI :10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.006
Sitaporn Youngkong6
Estimated H-index: 6
(Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program),
Rob Baltussen41
Estimated H-index: 41
(Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre)
+ 2 AuthorsYot Teerawattananon31
Estimated H-index: 31
(Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program)
Objectives: Considering rising health expenditure on the one hand and increasing public expectations on the other hand, there is a need for explicit health care rationing to secure public acceptance of coverage decisions of health interventions. The National Health Security Office, the institute managing the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand, recently called for more rational, transparent, and fair decisions on the public reimbursement of health interventions. This article describes the application of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to guide the coverage decisions on including health interventions in the Universal Coverage Scheme health benefit package in the period 2009‐2010. Methods: We described the MCDA priority-setting process through participatory observation and evaluated the rational, transparency, and fairness of the priority-setting process against the accountability for reasonableness framework. Results: The MCDA was applied in four steps: 1) 17 interventions were nominated for assessment; 2) nine interventions were selected for further quantitative assessment on the basis of the following criteria: size of population affected by disease, severity of disease, effectiveness of health intervention, variation in practice, economic impact on household expenditure, and equity and social implications; 3) these interventions were then assessed in terms of cost-effectiveness and budget impact; and 4) decision makers qualitatively appraised, deliberated, and reached consensus on which interventions should be adopted in the package. Conclusion: This project was carried out in a real-world context and has considerably contributed to the rational, transparent, and fair priority-setting process through the application of MCDA. Although the present project has applied MCDA in the Thai context, MCDA is adaptable to other settings.
  • References (32)
  • Citations (61)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
377 Citations
42 Citations
104 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Sirinart Tongsiri (MSU: Mahasarakham University)H-Index: 3
#2John Cairns (Lond: University of London)H-Index: 60
Abstract Objective To derive EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) health states values from the Thai general population. Methods Forty-eight trained individuals successfully conducted interviews with a representative sample of 1409 respondents in 2007. A total of 12 sets of health states were used with one set allocated to each respondent. A respondent was requested to assign values for 11 states using the ranking and visual analogue scale methods and 10 states using the time trade-off method. The v...
65 CitationsSource
#1Sitaporn Youngkong (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre)H-Index: 6
#2Noor Tromp (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre)H-Index: 10
Last. Dereck Chitama (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Correction After the publication of this article [1], we became aware that two last sentences in the paragraph relied on original ideas following personal communication with a researcher, and should not have been presented here. Consequently, the reference number 9 which was cited for the removed issue should be taken from the article. The correct paragraph is provided below: The explicit weighing of criteria analyzed from DCE may improve the consistency of priority setting across contexts and o...
10 CitationsSource
#1N. DevlinH-Index: 1
#2J. SussexH-Index: 1
What a health care system should pay for depends, of course, on the health gain that results. Health technology assessment (HTA) and cost-effectiveness analysis have become the core for many such decisions, by NICE in the UK and by similar bodies elsewhere. Other factors, however, also are taken into account by the governments and insurers who fund health care. These typically include - the impact of decisions on social equity[]; the quality of the patient experience; ramifications for the wider...
79 Citations
#1Roderik F. Viergever (WHO: World Health Organization)H-Index: 12
#2Sylvie Olifson (Global Forum for Health Research)H-Index: 5
Last. Robert F Terry (WHO: World Health Organization)H-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
Health research priority setting processes assist researchers and policymakers in effectively targeting research that has the greatest potential public health benefit. Many different approaches to health research prioritization exist, but there is no agreement on what might constitute best practice. Moreover, because of the many different contexts for which priorities can be set, attempting to produce one best practice is in fact not appropriate, as the optimal approach varies per exercise. Ther...
163 CitationsSource
#1Lydia Kapiriri (McMaster University)H-Index: 22
#2Douglas K. Martin (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 38
Priority setting remains a big challenge for health managers and planners, yet there is paucity of literature on evaluating priority setting. The purpose of this paper is to present a framework for evaluating priority setting in low and middle income countries. We conducted a qualitative study involving a review of literature and Delphi interviews with respondents knowledgeable of priority setting in low and middle income countries. Respondents were asked to identify the measures of successful p...
38 CitationsSource
#1Sitaporn Youngkong (Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program)H-Index: 6
#2Lydia Kapiriri (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 22
Last. Rob Baltussen (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre)H-Index: 41
view all 3 authors...
Summary Objective To assess and summarize empirical studies on priority-setting in developing countries. Methods Literature review of empirical studies on priority-setting of health interventions in developing countries in Medline and EMBASE (Ovid) databases. Results Eighteen studies were identified and classified according to their characteristics and methodological approaches. All studies were published after 1999, mostly between 2006 and 2008. Study objectives and methodologies varied conside...
66 CitationsSource
Objective: This paper assesses the health equity achievements of the Thai health system before and after the introduction of Universal Coverage (UC). It examines five dimensions of equity: equity in financial contributions, the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure, the degree of impoverishment as a result of household out-of-pocket payment for health, equity in health service use and the incidence of public subsidies for health. Methodology: The standard methods proposed by O’Donnell et ...
114 CitationsSource
#2Rob Baltussen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 41
Last. Samuel AdjeiH-Index: 30
view all 10 authors...
Objectives: To guide the Ministry of Health in Ghana in the priority setting of interventions by quantifying the trade-off between equity, efficiency, and other societal concerns in health. Methods: The study applied a multicriteria decision analytical framework. A focus group of seven policymakers identified the relevant criteria for priority setting and 63 policymakers participated in a discrete choice experiment to weigh their relative importance. Regression analysis was used to rank order a ...
66 CitationsSource
#1Yot Teerawattananon (Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program)H-Index: 31
#2Steve Russell (UEA: University of East Anglia)H-Index: 11
Background This paper presents qualitative findings from an assessment of the acceptability of using economic evaluation among policy actors in Thailand. Using cost-utility data from two economic analyses a hypothetical case scenario was created in which policy actors had to choose between two competing interventions to include in a public health benefit package. The two competing interventions, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for gallbladder disease versus renal dialysis for chronic renal dis...
13 CitationsSource
#1Norman DanielsH-Index: 45
Introduction Part I. A Theory of Justice and Health: 1. Three questions of justice 2. What is the special moral importance of health? 3. When are health inequalities unjust?: the social determinants of health 4. How can we meet health needs fairly when we can't meet them at all? 5. What do we owe each other?: implications of an integrated theory Part II. Challenges: 6. Global ageing and intergenerational equality 7. Consent to workplace risk and health protection 8. Medical professionalism and t...
546 Citations
Cited By61
#1Vusal Babashov (U of O: University of Ottawa)
#2Sarah Ben Amor (U of O: University of Ottawa)H-Index: 4
Last. Gilles Reinhardt (U of O: University of Ottawa)
view all 3 authors...
Background. Reviewing drugs to determine coverage or reimbursement level is a complex process that involves significant time and expertise. Review boards gather evidence from the submission provided, input from clinicians and patients, and results of clinical and economic reviews. This information consists of assessments on multiple criteria that often conflict with one another. Multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) includes methods to address complex decision making problems with conflicti...
#1Ahad Bakhtiari (Tehran University of Medical Sciences)H-Index: 4
#2Amirhossein Takian (Tehran University of Medical Sciences)H-Index: 13
Last. Ali Akbar Haghdoost (KMU: Kerman Medical University)H-Index: 29
view all 4 authors...
BACKGROUND: The WHO's "best buys" and other recommended interventions are a menu of policy options and cost-effective interventions for the prevention and control of major noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). The menu has six objectives, implementing which by member states is expected to promote the achievement of the nine NCD targets by 2025. In line with their context, countries can select from the menu of best buys and other recommended interventions. Iran adopted its national action plan on NCDs...
2 CitationsSource
Last. Javier Zarranz-Ventura (ISCIII: Carlos III Health Institute)
view all 20 authors...
The clinical and economic management of retinal diseases has become more complex following the introduction of new intravitreal treatments. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) offers the potential to overcome the challenges associated with traditional decision-making tools. A MCDA to determine the most relevant criteria to decision-making in the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) based on the perspectives of multiple stakeholders in Spain was developed. This MCDA was termed the MULTID...
#1S. Donya Razavi (McMaster University)H-Index: 1
#2Lydia Kapiriri (McMaster University)H-Index: 22
Last. Julia Abelson (McMaster University)H-Index: 39
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Background There is a growing body of literature that describes, applies, and evaluates applications of health-system priority-setting frameworks in different contexts. However, little explicit focus has been given to examining operationalization of the stakeholder participation component of these frameworks. The literature identifies the public as a stakeholder group and recommends their participation when applying the frameworks. Methods We conducted a scoping review to search the Pub...
#1Abbas Mardani (USF: University of South Florida)H-Index: 2
#2Robert E. Hooker (USF: University of South Florida)H-Index: 7
Last. Goh Chin Fei (IBS: International Business School, Germany)H-Index: 1
view all 7 authors...
Abstract Decision making techniques have been widely used in healthcare and medical industry. This study systematically reviews the conventional and fuzzy decision-making techniques applied in healthcare and medical problems. In total, we evaluated 202 published studies selected from 85 high-ranking journals, in which 130 of those published studies were directly related to the decision-making processes in healthcare and medical issues. Selected studies were classified into nine application areas...
2 CitationsSource
#1Salah GhabriH-Index: 4
#2Jean-Michel Josselin (University of Rennes)H-Index: 11
Last. Benoît Le Maux (University of Rennes)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Gunjeet Kaur (PGIMER: Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research)H-Index: 4
#2Shankar Prinja (PGIMER: Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research)H-Index: 21
Last. Yot Teerawattananon (Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program)H-Index: 31
view all 6 authors...
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to identify criteria being used for priority setting for resource allocation decisions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Furthermore, the included studies were analyzed from a policy perspective to understand priority setting processes in these countries. METHODS: Searches were carried out in PubMed, Embase, Econlit, and Cochrane databases, supplemented with pre-identified Web sites and bibliographic searches of relevant papers. Quality apprais...
1 CitationsSource
#1Chaw-Yin MyintH-Index: 1
#2Milena PavlovaH-Index: 28
Last. Wim GrootH-Index: 36
view all 4 authors...
We systematically review the health-financing mechanisms, revenue rising, pooling, purchasing, and benefits, in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the People’s Republic of China, and their impact on universal health coverage (UHC) goals in terms of universal financial protection, utilization/equity and quality. Two kinds of sources are reviewed: 1) academic articles, and 2) countries’ health system reports. We synthesize the findings from ASEAN countries and China reporting o...
#1Rob Baltussen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 41
#2Kevin MarshH-Index: 8
Last. Henk Broekhuizen (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 4
view all 23 authors...
Abstract Objective Recent years have witnessed an increased interest in the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support health technology assessment (HTA) agencies for setting healthcare priorities. However, its implementation to date has been criticized for being “entirely mechanistic,” ignoring opportunity costs, and not following best practice guidelines. This article provides guidance on the use of MCDA in this context. Methods The present study was based on a systematic review ...
#1Monika Wagner (Analytica)H-Index: 18
#2D Samaha (Analytica)H-Index: 2
Last. Michele TringaliH-Index: 4
view all 12 authors...
Background The accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework defines 4 conditions for legitimate healthcare coverage decision processes: Relevance, Publicity, Appeals, and Enforcement. The aim of this study was to reflect on how the diverse features of decision-making processes can be aligned with A4R conditions to guide decision-making towards legitimacy. Rare disease and regenerative therapies (RDRTs) pose special decision-making challenges and offer therefore a useful case study. Methods ...