What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers
Volume: 38, Issue: 4, Pages: 915 - 945
Published: Jan 1, 2001
Abstract
This study uses a national probability sample of 1,027 mathematics and science teachers to provide the first large-scale empirical comparison of effects of different characteristics of professional development on teachers’ learning. Results, based on ordinary least squares regression, indicate three core features of professional development activities that have significant, positive effects on teachers’ self-reported increases in knowledge and...
Paper Details
Title
What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers
Published Date
Jan 1, 2001
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
915 - 945
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History