Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
Abstract
Recent systematic reviews and empirical evaluations of the cognitive sciences literature suggest that publication and other reporting biases are prevalent across diverse domains of cognitive science. In this review, we summarize the various forms of publication and reporting biases and other questionable research practices, and overview the available methods for probing into their existence. We discuss the available empirical evidence for the...
Paper Details
Title
Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
Published Date
May 1, 2014
Journal
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
235 - 241
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History