The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record
Abstract
To evaluate the inter-rater agreement of the record review process of the Dutch Adverse Event study, which we aimed to improve by the involvement of two independent physician reviewers per record instead of one including a consensus procedure in case of disagreement.The inter-rater agreement within pairs of physicians (independent review between physician A+B) and between pairs of physicians (independent review between physician A+B and C+D) was...
Paper Details
Title
The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record
Published Date
Jan 1, 2010
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
94 - 102
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History