Accelerated publication versus usual publication in 2 leading medical journals.

Volume: 166, Issue: 9, Pages: 1137 - 43
Published: Apr 30, 2002
Abstract
A number of medical journals have developed policies for accelerated publication of articles judged by the authors, the editors or the peer reviewers to be of special importance. However, the validity of these judgements is unknown. We therefore compared the importance of articles published on a "fast track" with those published in the usual way.We identified 12 "case" articles--6 articles from the New England Journal of Medicine that were...
Paper Details
Title
Accelerated publication versus usual publication in 2 leading medical journals.
Published Date
Apr 30, 2002
Journal
Volume
166
Issue
9
Pages
1137 - 43
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.