Accuracy of Deception Judgments

Volume: 10, Issue: 3, Pages: 214 - 234
Published: Aug 1, 2006
Abstract
We analyze the accuracy of deception judgments, synthesizing research results from 206 documents and 24,483 judges. In relevant studies, people attempt to discriminate lies from truths in real time with no special aids or training. In these circumstances, people achieve an average of 54% correct lie-truth judgments, correctly classifying 47% of lies as deceptive and 61% of truths as nondeceptive. Relative to cross-judge differences in accuracy,...
Paper Details
Title
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Published Date
Aug 1, 2006
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
214 - 234
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.