Fairness as Appropriateness
Volume: 34, Issue: 5, Pages: 573 - 606
Published: Feb 10, 2009
Abstract
Epistemological differences fuel continuous and frequently divisive debates in the social sciences and the humanities. Sociologists have yet to consider how such differences affect peer evaluation. The empirical literature has studied distributive fairness, but neglected how epistemological differences affect perception of fairness in decision making. The normative literature suggests that evaluators should overcome their epistemological...
Paper Details
Title
Fairness as Appropriateness
Published Date
Feb 10, 2009
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
573 - 606
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History