Partial phase synchronization of neural populations due to random Poisson inputs.

Published on Aug 1, 2008in Journal of Computational Neuroscience1.57
· DOI :10.1007/s10827-007-0069-z
Per Danzl9
Estimated H-index: 9
(UC: University of California),
Robert Hansen1
Estimated H-index: 1
(UC: University of California)
+ 1 AuthorsJeff Moehlis26
Estimated H-index: 26
(UC: University of California)
We show that populations of identical uncoupled neurons exhibit partial phase synchronization when stimulated with independent, random unidirectional current spikes with interspike time intervals drawn from a Poisson distribution. We characterize this partial synchronization using the phase distribution of the population, and consider analytical approximations and numerical simulations of phase-reduced models and the corresponding conductance-based models of typical Type I (Hindmarsh–Rose) and Type II (Hodgkin–Huxley) neurons, showing quantitatively how the extent of the partial phase synchronization depends on the magnitude and mean interspike frequency of the stimulus. Furthermore, we present several simple examples that disprove the notion that phase synchrony must be strongly related to spike synchrony. Instead, the importance of partial phase synchrony is shown to lie in its influence on the response of the population to stimulation, which we illustrate using first spike time histograms.
  • References (38)
  • Citations (17)
#1Roberto Fernandez Galan (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 16
#2Nicolas Fourcaud-Trocmé (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 9
Last.Nathaniel N. Urban (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 29
view all 4 authors...
#1B. YuH-Index: 1
#2Pang-Chen SunH-Index: 1
Last.An-Chang ShiH-Index: 1
view all 7 authors...
#1Hiroya Nakao (Kyoto University)H-Index: 18
#2Kensuke Arai (Kyoto University)H-Index: 9
Last.Yoshiki Kuramoto (Hokkaido University)H-Index: 6
view all 5 authors...
#1Eric Brown (Princeton University)H-Index: 9
#2Jeff Moehlis (Princeton University)H-Index: 26
Last.Gary Aston-Jones (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 75
view all 6 authors...
#1Eric Brown (Princeton University)H-Index: 9
#2Jeff Moehlis (Princeton University)H-Index: 26
Last.Philip Holmes (Princeton University)H-Index: 66
view all 3 authors...
Cited By17
#1Bharat Monga (UC: University of California)H-Index: 2
#2Dan Wilson (UT: University of Tennessee)H-Index: 8
Last.Jeff Moehlis (UC: University of California)H-Index: 26
view all 5 authors...
#1Rupesh Kumar (JNU: Jawaharlal Nehru University)H-Index: 2
#2Shakir Bilal (DU: University of Delhi)
Last.Ram Ramaswamy (JNU: Jawaharlal Nehru University)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
#1G. Kumar (WashU: Washington University in St. Louis)
#2J.T. Ritt (BU: Boston University)
Last.ShiNung Ching (WashU: Washington University in St. Louis)H-Index: 15
view all 3 authors...
#1Jason T. Ritt (BU: Boston University)H-Index: 9
#2ShiNung Ching (WashU: Washington University in St. Louis)H-Index: 15
Aug 1, 2012 in EMBC (International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society)
#1Lars Haab (Saarland University)H-Index: 6
#2M. Scheerer (Saarland University)H-Index: 1
Last.Daniel J. Strauss (Saarland University)H-Index: 16
view all 5 authors...
View next paperA quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve