To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer

Volume: 40, Issue: 9, Pages: 832 - 839
Published: Sep 1, 2006
Abstract
Objective In order to inform discussions about possible changes to Medical Education's blinding policy, members of the journal's editorial board were interested in discovering reviewers' and authors' preferences with regard to the current double-blind policy and various alternatives. Methods In September 2005, an 8-question, web-based survey was sent to all authors and reviewers who had submitted or reviewed a manuscript for Medical Education in...
Paper Details
Title
To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer
Published Date
Sep 1, 2006
Volume
40
Issue
9
Pages
832 - 839
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.