Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers
Abstract
To assess revision rates after knee arthroplasty by comparing the cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies and arthroplasty registers. We hypothesised that the revision rate of all clinical studies of a given implant and register data would not differ significantly.A systematic review of clinical studies in indexed peer-reviewed journals was performed followed by internal and external validation. Parameters for measurement of revision...
Paper Details
Title
Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers
Published Date
Feb 1, 2013
Journal
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
263 - 268
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History