Match!

Control of citrus postharvest penicillium molds with sodium ethylparaben

Published on Apr 1, 2013in Crop Protection2.17
· DOI :10.1016/j.cropro.2012.12.007
Pedro A. Moscoso-Ramírez6
Estimated H-index: 6
,
Clara Montesinos-Herrero8
Estimated H-index: 8
,
Lluís Palou26
Estimated H-index: 26
Cite
Abstract
Abstract The curative antifungal activity of postharvest sodium ethylparaben (SEP) treatments against citrus green mold (GM) and blue mold (BM) was determined on different citrus species and cultivars artificially inoculated with Penicillium digitatum or Penicillium italicum and incubated at 20 °C and 90% RH for 7 d or stored at 5 °C and 90% RH for 8 weeks plus 7 d of shelf-life at 20 °C. The best concentration was selected in in vivo primary screenings with ‘Valencia’ oranges. SEP at 80 mM was tested at 20, 50 or 62 °C for 30, 60 or 150 s in small-scale trials to determine the best dip treatment conditions. Dips of 80 mM SEP at 20 °C for 60 s were selected and applied alone or in combination with 25 μL L −1 of the conventional fungicide imazalil (SEP + IMZ 25). Imazalil at the very low concentrations of 25 (IMZ 25) or 50 μL L −1 (IMZ 50) was also tested. Effectiveness of SEP alone at 20 °C for 60 s was significantly higher on oranges (cvs. ‘Valencia’ and ‘Lanelate’) than on mandarins (cvs. ‘Clemenules’, ‘Nadorcott’ and ‘Ortanique’), with GM and BM incidence reductions of up to 57–73% after 7 d at 20 °C. SEP was compatible with IMZ 25 and consistently improved its performance, irrespective of citrus cultivars and storage conditions. All treatments were less effective on ‘Clemenules’ mandarins. On ‘Valencia’ oranges stored for 8 weeks at 5 °C and 7 d at 20 °C, the combined treatment was significantly more effective than the single treatments (reductions of GM and BM incidence of about 96–93% and 55–39%, respectively). In additional tests, SEP, IMZ 25 and the combination applied at 20 °C for 60 s prevented GM on ‘Valencia’ oranges treated, inoculated with P. digitatum 24 h later and incubated at 20 °C for 7 d. It can be concluded from these results that SEP might be an integrating nonpollutant control alternative to be included in citrus postharvest disease control programs in the future.
  • References (24)
  • Citations (18)
Cite
References24
Newest
#1Zafar Iqbal (Curtin University)H-Index: 1
#2Zora Singh (Curtin University)H-Index: 22
Last.Saeed Ahmad (Curtin University)H-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
#1Joseph L. Smilanick (USDA: United States Department of Agriculture)H-Index: 40
#2M. F. Mansour (USDA: United States Department of Agriculture)H-Index: 1
Last.W.R. Goodwine (Janssen Pharmaceutica)H-Index: 2
view all 5 authors...
Cited By18
Newest
#1Chenjun Zhuang (SJTU: Shanghai Jiao Tong University)H-Index: 1
#2Yongli Jiang (SJTU: Shanghai Jiao Tong University)H-Index: 1
Last.Hangjun ChenH-Index: 1
view all 10 authors...
#1Feng Zhu (HAU: Huazhong Agricultural University)H-Index: 4
#2Jiajing Chen (HAU: Huazhong Agricultural University)H-Index: 4
Last.Xiuxin Deng (HAU: Huazhong Agricultural University)H-Index: 35
view all 9 authors...
View next paperCharacterization of postharvest treatments with sodium methylparaben to control citrus green and blue molds